Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom; Mrs. Don-o; Salvation
Posts 68 and 72 that you are ignoring:A related question would be, "Just what were the books Paul was referring to as Scripture in, for instance, 2 Tim 3:6"? So I go on to ask:

How do you know?

How do you know they’re from the apostles?

How do you know they’ve been passed down faithfully?

What is your source for verifying all of the above?

Please provide the sources for verification purposes.

I'm interested, metmom.

So then according to you, you refuse to accept the Bible since those books were handed down by tradition. Your words:I don’t accept tradition, no matter how it’s packaged.

The books of the OT were handed down by tradition until the Canon was set. Now Catholics believe in the Alexandrian Canon, ordered several hundred years BC. Prots believe in the Palestinian canon ordered in 90 AD. Following the Palestinian canon gives several problems. This is the canon that denied Jesus. Second by what authority was it ordered?

So while you are going off on your tangents the questions still remain (See above in Italics.)

113 posted on 12/06/2014 4:11:25 PM PST by verga (You anger Catholics by telling them a lie, you anger protestants by telling them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: verga

Scripture was written down.

That is not the kind of tradition that Catholics are referring to when they say that the RCC uses *sacred tradition*.

And since it was written down, it’s no longer tradition.


114 posted on 12/06/2014 6:19:54 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson