Your comment was that he removed them from the Bible.
That is not true and that Catholic site says as much.
They were INCLUDED in the Bible that he translated.
He translated them and put them in the book.
How is that *removing* them and why do you persist in stating that he did when he didn’t?
His opinion about whether they belonged in the canon is not what you stated. You stated that he removed them and he didn’t.
If you wish to argue about his opinion of whether they belonged in the canon, then address that, but don’t keep saying that he did something he didn’t do.
He translated them and put them in the book.
Don't be argumentative. When someone normally says "Bible" they mean the collection of Sacred Scriptures, not the additional material that is included in a particular edition.