Your statement: “It is RCC fiction and an unfounded hope in an unprovable myth...until Christ appears again and sets matters straight.”
You shouldn’t call the teachings of the Catholic Church “fiction” if you can not prove it incorrect. I do think that your statement’s intent is to mislead others. I have not tried to pass judgment on others, only on their misleading statements.
The teachings of the rcc have been shown time and time again to be in error when compared to Scripture. Yet the catholic refuses to recognize such.
Luke 1:28 has been explained time and time and time again on this board, yet catholicism still clings to the dogma espoused by the rcc.
It has been shown numerous times that the catholic apologists recognize you cannot directly point to Scripture or "Tradition" to justify the immaculate conception. Yet catholics on this board persist in claiming you can.
This is why Christians rise up and post the articles we do to point out the errors of the rcc. And when we do, the catholic resorts to name calling and calls to ban the thread. These are sure signs of a cult.
If catholicism cannot stand to have its' teachings exposed to the light of the Truth, then that tells us they are lurking in the darkness.
I do agree we shouldn't call the assumption and immaculate conception fiction though. They should be called what they are.
False teachings of a cult that has deceived many.
Your statement: “The teachings of the rcc have been shown time and time again to be in error when compared to Scripture. Yet the catholic refuses to recognize such.”
Again another biased statement with no substance.