I agree. I mean the pro-circumcise crowd should be stunned that it hasn’t been infected and fallen off after 4 years. /s
I find it irritating that people still use the excuse that it’s for hygiene and the safety of the child...
Makes one wonder... How have the other 3 Billion males made it?
People condemn the muzzies for cutting women, yet cutting males is ok? Why in the world are we cutting at all. Let the child decide what to do to their body, after they turn 18.
Sorry, don’t agree with you at all.
Their business, not mine.
The only problem I have with what you are saying is that my cousin wasn’t circumcised at birth. As his body and penis grew his foreskin didn’t and ended up closing over his urethra. At six when he had the operation so he could actually urinate, at least with some stream control or stream at all, it was a much worse experience. The recovery was unpleasant.
The Bible speaks very highly of it... Perhaps you should read it.
“People condemn the muzzies for cutting women, yet cutting males is ok?”
The muzzies cut males too! When the boy is 7 years old!!!
“People condemn the muzzies for cutting women, yet cutting males is ok? “
They are done differently.
A friend’s father absolutely insisted that all his grandsons be circumcised.
He remembered WW1 where men were not able to do proper hygiene and gangrene was setting in.
That’s something to think about.
I had an uncle who had it done as a teen because of repeated infections, here in the US, and he suffered for it.
Choosing to do it past infancy is no picnic for men.