Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
When it is explained for the billionth time that the title “Mother of God” does not mean, and has never meant, anything so moronic, the explanations will be ignored.

Now that's funny, I don't care who ya are...

When it is explained for the billionth time that the title “Mother of God” does not mean, and has never meant, 'Mother of God'...

153 posted on 01/25/2015 1:20:08 AM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool

I say: The title “Mother of God” has never meant that Mary is the mother of the eternal Triune God.

Your position is: I reject the title “Mother of God” because Mary could not be the mother of the eternal Triune God.

I explain again: The title “Mother of God” has always meant that Mary is the mother of Jesus, and because Jesus is the Second Person of the Trinity, who is God, and Mary is his mother, Mary can be properly called the “Mother of God.”

You answer: I reject the title “Mother of God” because Mary could not be the mother of the eternal Triune God.

Am I following the conversation accurately so far?


158 posted on 01/25/2015 1:56:14 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: Iscool; Arthur McGowan

Do you agree that Mary is the mother of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ?


195 posted on 01/25/2015 3:59:21 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson