Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
Consuming the blood of the Passover lamb would have been disgusting.

No, consuming the blood of the Passover lamb would have been a violation of the law of God. So why would Jesus ask His apostles to violate the law of God?

185 posted on 01/29/2015 11:05:16 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

Jesus is NOT the Passover lamb. Jesus is prefigured by the Passover lamb.

The prohibition on drinking the blood of the lamb signified that the life of the lamb came from God and belonged to God.

The command to drink the blood of Jesus signifies that Jesus’ life does NOT belong to God any longer. It belongs to US because Jesus gave his life for us. Thus, his blood—the symbol of his life—also belongs to us. He TELLS us this precisely by commanding us to drink his blood.

To refuse to drink the blood of Jesus is to refuse the gift of his life that he wills to give to us.

To cling to the law of the Old Covenant is to refuse the gift given to us under the New Covenant.


193 posted on 01/29/2015 1:43:42 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative

Bingo !!!


222 posted on 01/29/2015 4:30:19 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Ga 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson