Apparently prots don't think so, if He can't turn bread and wine into His literal Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity!
Does it taste like bread and wine to you or flesh and blood? This was the “issue” Martin Luther had.
I still think it is just a representation of Jesus’ flesh and blood, not literally. Unlike the water turning to wine, Jesus does not turn the wine into blood, or the wafer into flesh. That is cannibalism. I think the reason we are to drink the wine and eat the wafer instead of pouring it onto an altar or a statue of Jesus on the cross, is because we are not to make any images of God. Just my opinion.
As for the example of David and his officers, David had been thirsty and given water. Where does it say he had blood? He was saying if he drank the water, it would be giving credence to the willfully selfish act of putting the life (the life is in the blood) of his beloved men before his own needs. No Godly king would do such a thing, nor a righteous warrior. David was not saying the water they brought from the well was blood. Good grief.
Apparently prots don't think so, if He can't turn bread and wine into His literal Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity! - vergie
Hahahahaaaa.! For someone so (supposedly) learned, it seems another error appears.
Omniscient is defined as "knowing all". I read the screed as (apparently) incorrect by using that term instead of the actually accurate, "omnipotent" which is defined as "all powerful"!
Again, demonstrating ANOTHER error of the "PR" department of the Catholic cult!
