Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlatherNaut

Barring a reliable source, I think the claim to his Chalcedonian sympathies is bogus. He would not be venerated as a saint by the Armenian Church if he had been defending a theological formula they had condemned. This sounds like something cooked up in an effort to explain why Catholics were being allowed to venerate a schismatic/heretic as a saint. Especially in the years before V-II that sort of thing would have raised a lot of eyebrows.


23 posted on 02/24/2015 5:50:15 PM PST by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: NRx

You make excellent points.


24 posted on 02/24/2015 5:55:21 PM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: NRx; BlatherNaut
This sounds like something cooked up in an effort to explain why Catholics were being allowed to venerate a schismatic/heretic as a saint. Especially in the years before V-II that sort of thing would have raised a lot of eyebrows.

I think you may be on to something here. It is my understanding that Gregory of Narek was not included in the Roman Martyrology until 2005. Prior to VII, he is not to be found in the Roman Martyrology of the Catholic Church.

29 posted on 02/25/2015 5:48:48 AM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson