Replies

It's funny you castigate me for using the ESV instead of the KJV... when the translation accepted by your cult says the following for Acts 17:23:

Only now you name it "ESV," after I called out the false attribution to the KJV. It may be funny to you; I find your comments uninspired and uninspiring. The entire thread and issue may be a joke or entertainment to you but I find it a waste of time treating with an "Internet Theologian" unwilling to shine the light of truth on the faith community, sect, or cult do he affiliates.

Try re-reading MY posts. I agreed that you posted from the KJV. My issue was the Catholic interpretation put to it.

I quoted back to you from the ESV. Then I proceeded to answer your accusation that I rejected the KJV. Show me where I used the word rejected.

Then, I attempted to explain that I like the KJV as well as the ESV and why I use the ESV.

I'd appreciate a little accuracy here.

Now. Can you, instead of deflecting, answer my question to you as to why the Roman Catholic Church refutes God in CCC 969 my claiming Mary as "medatrix" when God's inspired word in 1 Timothy 2:5 states there is ONE mediator between God and men, the man Jesus Christ?

How do untangle that? If you can, we'll continue. Otherwise, see ya.

Hoss