Skip to comments.
Four reasons why the Bread of Life Discourse cannot be a metaphor
http://newtheologicalmovement.blogspot.com ^
| June 25, 2011
| Father Ryan Erlenbush
Posted on 03/28/2015 7:24:04 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
1
posted on
03/28/2015 7:24:04 PM PDT
by
NKP_Vet
To: NKP_Vet
Romanists can’t write an article about their interpretations without at the exact same time denigrating everyone else.
2
posted on
03/28/2015 7:37:00 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: NKP_Vet
To: Secret Agent Man
Not denigrating, but pointing out what you have been taught about the Holy Eucharist is wrong, so you might come to appreciate the greatest gift He left His Church, His actual, physical and spiritual presence in the form of bread and wine.
4
posted on
03/28/2015 7:56:36 PM PDT
by
I-ambush
(Five year plans and New Deals, wrapped in golden chains...)
To: I-ambush
It is at best unnecesarily antagonistic. The way it’s written will never bring anyone to your side. But e see this in almost every apologetic piece Roman authors write that are posted here. And we’re told of course that isn’t the case.
5
posted on
03/28/2015 7:59:10 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: I-ambush
Do you even know what denomination I am, for you to say that?
6
posted on
03/28/2015 8:00:06 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Secret Agent Man
Wouldn’t that be because someone is literally denigrating the Eucharist???
If the shoe fits...
AMDG
7
posted on
03/28/2015 8:12:21 PM PDT
by
LurkingSince'98
(Ad Majoram Dei Gloriam = FOR THE GREATER GLORY OF GOD)
To: NKP_Vet; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; ...
This is simply redundant Romanism. So how many times must your your pasted polemics be exposed as specious? Its coming by God's grace. Better get the thread locked now!
8
posted on
03/28/2015 8:13:34 PM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
To: Secret Agent Man
Romanists can’t write an article about their interpretations without at the exact same time denigrating everyone else. stating the truth denigrates noone....and it isn't an "interpretation"
9
posted on
03/28/2015 8:18:38 PM PDT
by
terycarl
(common sense prevails over all)
To: NKP_Vet
Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees.
later
How is it you do not understand I did not speak to you of bread?but you should beware of the leaven of thepharisees and Saducees? Then they understood that He did not tell them to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and Saducees.
To: terycarl
stating the truth denigrates noone....and it isn't an "interpretation" When papists start telling the truth, I'll listen.
To: NKP_Vet
12
posted on
03/28/2015 8:21:33 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: PetroniusMaximus
Is Jesus made of wood? No, and He's not made of flesh and blood anymore. He is Spirit.
To: Salvation
To: terycarl
When you unnecessarily insult others it does.
And since there are differing beliefs on a specific point, that inherently means there are different interpretations. It is not a statement that makes a judgment on the Roman view being right or wrong, it’s a statement based on the definition of English words and their literal meanings.
15
posted on
03/28/2015 8:25:15 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: NKP_Vet
The ONE reason why the Bread of Life Discourse HAD to be metaphor:
The bread didn't change into human flesh and the wine didn't change into human blood.
16
posted on
03/28/2015 8:25:43 PM PDT
by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
To: BipolarBob
No, and He's not made of flesh and blood anymore. He is Spirit. What, you do not believe in the Resurrection?
To: Petrosius
Good grief. Where do you come up with that?
To: PetroniusMaximus
I see where you are going with this. :-)
19
posted on
03/28/2015 8:30:48 PM PDT
by
cantfindagoodscreenname
(I really hate not knowing what was said in the deleted posts....)
To: BipolarBob
Good grief. Where do you come up with that? Because his resurrected Body is made of flesh and blood, of which you say he is no longer made.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson