Posted on 04/14/2015 7:56:44 AM PDT by Gamecock
America is in the midst of a seismic cultural shift in matters of faith, family, and freedom.
More than 35 states now issue same-sex marriage licenses. An increasing number of scholars and judges insist that the First Amendment only protects the freedom to believe—not the freedom to live out those beliefs. At least one state now compels employers to provide insurance coverage for elective abortions. Many cities nationwide ban religious employers from hiring and firing based on their religious convictions. Gender fluidity is gaining legal and political legitimacy.
Churches cannot afford to ignore the fallout of the sexual revolution. Churches that desire to maintain a faithful gospel witness increasingly feel the effects of these cultural changes.
Pastors are being asked to perform same-sex ceremonies and admit same-sex couples to marriage enrichment retreats. Churches face litigation for holding their employees—including pastors or music directors—to a biblical sexual ethic. Church administrators receive requests to use church sanctuaries for same-sex ceremonies. Pastors who teach the sanctity of human life and the creation institution of marriage are frequently labeled “political” and threatened with the loss of their church’s tax-exempt status.
These new political, cultural, and legal realities directly affect the church’s freedom to live out its faith. While most church decisions about internal governance or doctrine currently enjoy constitutional protection, churches cannot assume that these protections will stand indefinitely. Maintaining a gospel-centered witness in today’s culture requires not only standing firm on the truths of Scripture, but also taking affirmative steps to protect the church’s freedom to continue peacefully teach and live out its faith.
Here are five ways churches can protect their freedom to maintain fidelity to the faith.
1. Adopt a written statement of faith about marriage.
A church does not need to commit every detail of doctrine to writing. But marriage warrants special inclusion in church bylaws, statements of faith, or other policy documents, because the definition of marriage is hotly debated at the intersection of law, faith, and culture. A statement on marriage clarifies the church’s beliefs about marriage—both for the congregation and the culture—and serves as the starting point for any church decisions related to marriage and human sexuality.
2. Establish religious employment criteria.
Require all employees to affirm that they hold to the church’s statement of faith and doctrine and are willing to abide by them. Also ensure that each employee has a written job description. Each job description should go beyond listing the physical duties involved to specifying the position’s spiritual responsibilities and clearly explaining how it furthers the church’s mission. These details help reinforce the religious nature of the employment relationship.
3. Create a facility use policy.
If the church owns a facility that it permits others to use outside of normal church operation or events, the church should establish a written facility policy that details the terms under which it may be used. For example, the policy should establish an application and approval process, specifically detail the religious nature of the facility, and expressly prohibit uses that are inconsistent with the church's religious beliefs.
4. Establish a written marriage policy.
A church should have a written policy detailing both the marriages that the church will recognize and also the circumstances under which the pastor will solemnize a union. This policy adds another layer of protection for the pastor who is asked to perform a wedding that he cannot, in good conscience, officiate.
5. Adopt a written membership policy.
Only those persons who “unite” with the church have consented to the church’s authority over them. As a result, churches with formal members have greater legal protection when it becomes necessary to exercise church discipline. Churches are encouraged to adopt a written membership policy that explains the procedure for becoming a church member, procedures for member discipline, and procedures for rescinding church membership.
Of course, this recommendation does not mean that a church should adopt a form of church government to which it does not subscribe. Churches can still have designated members who affirm they are committed to and part of a church body, even if there is no voting or say in church practices.
Alliance Defending Freedom has developed a resource to help churches accomplish these five steps. This resource is designed to help churches strengthen their governing documents and internal policies in order to avoid obstacles to gospel ministry. Included within the resource are sample statements and language that each church or ministry may adapt to suit its unique needs.
Should your church or ministry face threat of litigation for operating according to its faith, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys stand ready to defend you, free of charge.
Today’s political, legal, and cultural climate poses new challenges to gospel ministry. But by both addressing the challenges of today and taking affirmative steps for tomorrow, the church can protect its freedom to continue faithfully carrying out its mission.
Try reading and then following God’s Law. That would be a great starting place. Stand up for those timeless principles. Remind people that marriage is a covenant not a contract and that as such government cannot be involved before the fact, either to regulate or to license.
Remind government that people who are sexually immoral cannot inherit the Kingdom of God, but that is a matter for God, not government. So, don’t force Christians to be enablers for sexual immorality.
That is all true, of course.
The issue is the left has perverted what Scripture says and sadly we have to affirm exactly what we believe in a separate document.
There is an additional way to deal with the secularization of marriage. They have done it in France, probably for 200 years, certainly for my lifetime, which is a bit less.
The only marriage recognized by the government is one performed by a civil magistrate in a government office. If two people don’t go through the civil ceremony, they aren’t “married” for legal purposes.
Christians, and no doubt those of other religions, can then go to their church, if they meet its requirements, and have their marriage performed by a priest.
Combined with the advice given in this article, I think the problem goes away. As far as I know, every state has some version of civil “marriage.”
The Bible means exactly what it says. As we saw 2,000 years ago, if God wants to change it, he will let us know. The Bible means exactly what it says. If liberal thugs want to change it, they need to pass an Amendment through the proper legal process, not just redefine or reinterpret words.
"The free exercise thereof" covers the exercise of religion, not just worship and not just belief. My right to refuse to participate in fake "marriage" ceremonies is an absolute, and I cannot legally or morally be punished by FedGov for acting on my religious beliefs. My right to refuse to pay for murdering innocent unborn children is an absolute. FedGov has no legal authority to compel me to violate these beliefs, and so long as enough decent people stand up for freedom, they will have no power to compel good people to support evil.
You forgot - they need to drop the 501(c)(3) garbage. I realize this means that tithe payers would no longer be able to deduct their contributions, but this is what must be done. Until this happens, we are rendering unto Caesar what is God’s.
Who wants a marriage that isn’t legal?
We can already do that, and we always could, a man and a woman, or two gays, or 5 people living together can all be privately married to each other, and they could do that 50 years ago as long as they didn’t bother the rest of us with their claim.
[[Many cities nationwide ban religious employers from hiring and firing based on their religious convictions.]]
So- cities get to discriminate against religious businesses based on the cities religious, or rather lack of religious beliefs? I guess you are only able ot discriminate if you are anti-religious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.