Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Apologetics: Non-Catholics in the Communion Line
Catholic Answers ^ | April 15, 2015 | Michelle Arnold

Posted on 04/15/2015 1:38:52 PM PDT by NYer

There are usually a few Masses per year at which there can be expected to be a large number of non-Catholics present. Christmas and Easter Masses are popular with non-Catholics, mainly because they are visiting Catholic family and friends. Nuptial Masses, especially when one of the parties to be married is a non-Catholic Christian, will have large turnouts of non-Catholics (sometimes up to half the congregation). Non-Catholics can also be expected at Masses offered for other sacramental firsts and life-cycle events, such as confirmations and funerals.

This reality raises a common question for the apologists here at Catholic Answers: What should happen at Communion time? Here's a recent question I received on the issue.

At my granddaughter's First Communion, the priest announced that if there were any Episcopalians present they could receive Communion because they believe in the Real Presence. Other Protestants could come forward for a blessing. When did the teaching change on receiving Communion? I thought you had to be in full union with Rome. My son-in-law is Protestant and this caused real confusion for us.

In this case, both the priest and the inquirer were mistaken, to some extent, in their respective understandings of the Church's sacramental discipline.

The priest was incorrect that Episcopalians ordinarily may receive Communion at a Catholic Mass. Since Episcopalians do not have valid holy orders, they do not have a valid Communion. The fact that they believe that Jesus is in some way present in the Eucharist does not mean that they fully share Catholic faith in the nature of the Real Presence.

The inquirer also was not entirely correct that those who receive Communion must be "in full union with Rome." Orthodox Christians, and members of a few other Christian churches with valid holy orders and a valid Eucharist, are allowed to receive Communion when attending Catholic Masses. The Guidelines for the Reception of Communion state:

Members of the Orthodox churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these churches (canon 844 §3).

Occasionally, under special circumstances, a baptized non-Catholic Christian may receive the Eucharist if there is grave need, the Christian "spontaneously asks" for the sacraments, and if he cannot approach his own minister:

Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 §4) [Guidelines].

These guidelines, which are based on canon law, are rather complex and shot through with exceptions to the general principles. That can make it difficult for clergy and laity alike to offer blanket guidelines for reception of Communion when non-Catholics are present at a Catholic Mass.

And, all too often, off-the-cuff announcements made by the presider at Mass, usually right before Communion is distributed, do not accurately reflect the Church's discipline on reception of the Eucharist. It may be more common these days to hear a variant of the announcement quoted earlier, inviting "all who believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist" to receive Communion, but the less-common announcement that "Communion is reserved to practicing Catholics in a state of grace" also is problematic.

What can be done? Here are a few suggestions for clergy and laity alike.

Learn the guidelines. I trust that clergy are fully instructed in the guidelines for reception of the sacraments while in seminary. But because the guidelines are not easily boiled down to either "Come one, come all" or "Practicing Catholics only!" then I can only suggest regular reading of the USCCB's Guidelines and the relevant section from canon law (canon 844). We have looked at the USCCB's summary; here is canon 844:

§1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ's faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers, except as provided in §2, 3, and 4 of this canon and in canon 861 §2.

§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, Christ's faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose churches these sacraments are valid [emphasis added].

§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick to members of the Eastern churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to members of other churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same position as the aforesaid Eastern churches so far as the sacraments are concerned.

§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan bishop or of the episcopal conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed [emphasis added].

§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or the episcopal conference is not to issue general norms except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local level, of the non-Catholic church or community concerned.

Given the importance of access to the sacraments by all those duly permitted and properly disposed to receive them, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, I do not think it is unreasonable to recommend that priests and deacons memorize this canon and the USCCB's Guidelines. Or, if memorization is impossible, clergy can print out both the canon and the Guidelines on the front and back of a laminated card and keep it on their person at all times, as police officers do with The Miranda Warning.

Publish the guidelines. The missalettes used in many American Catholic parishes often print the USCCB's Guidelines, usually on the inside front cover. If a parish uses a missalette that has the USCCB's Guidelines available, great. If not, then contact the USCCB and request permission to reprint the Guidelines onto card stock to create a sturdy insert that can be placed inside all of the parish's missalettes. Extras can be placed in the parish's literature racks.

Promote the guidelines. Once a parish has determined where its copies of the Guidelines are—whether they are already printed in the parish missalettes or are printed by the parish on card stock and placed in the missalettes—the parish can create a plan of action for promoting the Guidelines at liturgies where non-Catholics are expected to be present. For example, a regular announcement before Masses offered at Christmas, Easter, and for weddings and funerals can be to direct the congregation's attention to the Guidelines and ask the congregation to read the Guidelines before the liturgy begins. For example:

Before we begin, we would like to direct your attention to the Guidelines for Reception of Communion, which can be found on the inside front-cover of the missalettes placed in the pew pockets in front of you. Please take a moment to read the Guidelines so that you may properly discern whether or not you are able to receive Communion during this liturgy. We welcome all who are unable to receive Communion to offer silent prayer or personal reflection during the Rite of Communion.

Nota bene: The announcement suggested here (my own wording, which may be revised appropriately at the discretion of clergy) is not an open call to receive Communion, nor does it make assumptions about who is properly disposed to receive. It simply directs all present to read the Church's guidelines for receiving Communion and to discern their own preparedness for reception. No assumptions are made about the personal religious convictions of those visiting, some of whom may either not be comfortable praying in common with Christians or may not even be theists (which is why the invitation to "personal reflection" is extended).

When the Church's guidelines are not heeded

Despite all of these precautions, there may be times when someone who in not properly disposed to receive Communion receives Communion anyway. It is more likely that a layperson will notice this than will a member of the clergy.

Clergy have the authority to counsel people not to receive Communion; laypersons have the authority to make the guidelines for receiving Communion known. In a previous blog post, I offered these suggestions to laity concerned about the proper reception of Communion by non-practicing Catholics or non-Catholics:

Bottom line: We must accept that human persons have free will, and may freely choose to use it either positively or negatively. We can offer information. When we have the authority to do so, we can counsel accordingly. In a few individual cases, it may be that ecclesial authorities can take more drastic steps to protect the Blessed Sacrament from unworthy reception.

But there is only so much we can do to inform, counsel, and instruct. In the end, ultimate responsibility for worthy reception of Communion belongs to the individual communicant. We can trust that God knows that communicant's mind and heart, and that he will respond to that person accordingly.

In order that this judgment [by the Lord] be favorable or rather that I be not judged at all, I want to be charitable in my thoughts toward others at all times, for Jesus has said, "Judge not, and you shall not be judged" (St. Therese of Lisieux).



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholicanswers; catholicapologetics; communionline; holycommunion; michellearnold; noncatholics; wannabecatholics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: kearnyirish2

“The Orthodox Churches are not Catholic, but may receive.”

Not without self excommunicating themselves.


41 posted on 04/15/2015 3:38:08 PM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

The state of the priests soul is irrelevant. He is the in person am Cristi.
I’m an EME. If someone walks up to me and says, I am living in sin but want Communion anyway I would not offer the host. Other than that I do not know the state of his/her soul.


42 posted on 04/15/2015 3:38:12 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
I don't see any way around it. What percentage of the Catholic Church is actually in schism?

Well during the Arian crisis 75% of the Church was in schism at one point in time or another, I think things may be worse now.

43 posted on 04/15/2015 3:38:22 PM PDT by Legatus (I think, therefore you're out of your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Legatus
Well during the Arian crisis 75% of the Church was in schism at one point in time or another, I think things may be worse now.

Is the schismatic portion still considered "of the Church"?

44 posted on 04/15/2015 3:43:04 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: piusv
“Heretic” has become a dirty word.

A word that RCs bandy about on FR toward non-Catholic Christians with abandon. You must have noticed.

(Apparently, only FRoman Catholics can call other FR posters that noun. How did that happen?)
45 posted on 04/15/2015 3:43:50 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Actually, I don’t see that accusation often. I have made it here and I don’t recall a fellow Catholic ever agreeing with me. That’s because they have been told by the post-Vatican II church that Protestants aren’t called heretics anymore. Heretics only lived in the 1500’s.


46 posted on 04/15/2015 3:47:23 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Of course you are not in a position to know, it is the personal responsibility of the communicant.


47 posted on 04/15/2015 3:47:44 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: piusv
Actually, I don’t see that accusation often.

Okay, then. I have in fact seen the word thrown as an epithet on FR Religion Forum threads and too often. Guess it's more noticeable when one is on the receiving end?
48 posted on 04/15/2015 3:52:04 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I can’t help but wonder what your practicing mother has to say, to your lapsed Catholic sister and the protestant brother-in-law, about the dangers to the soul, for receiving our Lord when entirely outside of a state of grace and from outside the Church.

What is it that Catholics and their priests are silent against mortal sin, in these cases, even are complicit in mortal sin?

I believe it is lack of belief in the Real Presence, which is a mortal sin in its own right. Just wondering what you think. Your own respect for the Eucharist is a virtue, my friend.


49 posted on 04/15/2015 3:53:28 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; CynicalBear; daniel1212; HossB86; ...

I don’t recall Jesus making any distinction about denominational lines when He served the bread and the wine.

Interestingly, Catholics insist that eternal, spiritual life is given through eating the eucharist, tell those who are not Catholics in good standing or not Catholics at all, that they cannot receive communion, thereby denying them the opportunity to receive eternal life, and then try to deny that salvation is not though their church alone, as the CCC says when it states that there is no salvation outside the Catholic church.

They’d deny the opportunity for eternal life to those seeking is because they’re not part of the approved elite.

They’re like the Pharisees who try to prevent those from entering in who would want to, unless they jump through the right hoops, saying that they alone have the keys to eternal life and yet being the self-appointed gatekeepers who are more intent on keeping people out than letting them in.


50 posted on 04/15/2015 4:00:59 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer
How does one recognize them in the long line of communicants?

If they look like Nancy Polosi or Ted Kennedy, vocal advocates of "a woman's right to choose", absent an equally vocal retraction of said advocacy, they're baby-killers.

51 posted on 04/15/2015 4:02:13 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

I honestly have never seen them call Protestants “heretics”. I have seen phrases like “heretical views” or call a belief “heresy”.

Are you saying you’ve seen a lot of the former or latter?


52 posted on 04/15/2015 4:02:52 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

A year ago Easter our granddaughter entered the Church. Her mother, my daughter, and our son showed up as well as our granddaughter’s father who has never been a protestant. I started encouraging my daughter and son to go to confession a month or two ahead of the service. I didn’t feel like it was my job to ask them whether they went. I am pretty sure that they did not and that they are not in current communion with the Church. They and even my former son in law trooped up for Communion. Should I have tackled them? :-\


53 posted on 04/15/2015 4:07:51 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NRx

You and I have discussed this before I believe.

The way the Orthodox view reception of Holy Communion is how the Catholic Church used to view it and enforce it.


54 posted on 04/15/2015 4:13:25 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: piusv

Yeah, Rome used to be a lot tighter on this subject. And a few others now that I think about it.


55 posted on 04/15/2015 4:19:31 PM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I have no desire to stand in a “communion line” in a Roman church...that bread is a demonic idol..


56 posted on 04/15/2015 4:28:09 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bkmk


57 posted on 04/15/2015 4:31:53 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I am not Catholic and do not want to be.

With that said, I respect their beliefs, and I would never even CONSIDER taking communion while attending a Mass in a Catholic Church as a guest/visitor.


58 posted on 04/15/2015 4:32:46 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Darn tootin it was.


59 posted on 04/15/2015 4:33:03 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Wow....and here I was thinking Communion was open to anyone who professed faith in Christ as it is a remembrance of Him.
60 posted on 04/15/2015 4:34:25 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson