Which leaves you open the charge i have seen from an RC, that you are as a Prot., since the basis for what you hold as being Truth is your interpretation of historical teaching.
Of course, whether defenders of Rome who attach evans for interpreting Scripture (their supreme Source) admit it or not, even so-called infallible teaching as well as those on lower magisterial levels, are subject to varying degrees of interpretation, including on what level they belong (incldg V2).
And which is much done by lower magisterial levels, with actions and fruit being what Biblically evidences what one really believes. (Ja. 2:18; Mt. 7:20)
Which has been much that of liberalism and less unity overall in basic beliefs than evangelicals .
“No replies.”