Vatican II taught NO such thing. Those types of *innovations* were brought about by both clerics and lay alike....who had not fully read the documents of Vatican II.
really...did I need to post a sarcasm tag...?
and while we’re at it, what is your reasoning as to the necessity, or for that matter, the wisdom in convening Vatican II...? I mean,considering the clerics never bothered to read the documents it produced, it couldn’t have been of any real value...
I mean,considering the clerics never bothered to read the documents it produced, it couldn’t have been of any real value...
________________________________________
I honestly missed the sarcasm. It may be because of seeing so many many people dissing the Church these days. Some want the Church to change and be more liberal; others want the Church to revert to Latin only liturgies. I reacted in a somewhat knee-jerk fashion. Apologies.
To respond to what you stated above, I can only say that the position of Apostle was offered to Judas and he allowed his own disorder to prevail instead. This is also what happened to SOME clerics and then with some laity with the implementation of Vatican II. They simply chose their own ideas of how to do this, rather than that of the holy men who honestly were trying to follow the lead of the Holy Spirit. Their own disorder prevailed rather than what God’s Spirit was offering.
I have also honestly wondered how many people were regularly praying for the Church in those days...?
Ephesians 6:18