No need for snark. Dust of the earth? OK, but HOW did he do tha?
I’ve probably read the Bible more times than you can count, but I still have questions.
Yes there is. And will remain so as long as you hypocrites insist on subjecting the bringing into being of everything from nothing to "scientific laws" while still believing that a virgin gave birth through her side so her hymen would remain intact. Why no "scientific laws" to explain that, hmm?
Dust of the earth? OK, but HOW did he do tha?
What "natural laws" did he use to cause the resurrection? The multiplication of loaves and fishes? Don't tell me . . . those where "miracles." But the creation of man has to be "natural!"
I’ve probably read the Bible more times than you can count, but I still have questions.
So? What have "questions" to do with rejecting the Biblical narrative and insisting on scientific uniformitarianism?