“So tell me if God “wonderfully knit him together in his mother’s womb” why then why would God be happy or even accepting of Bruce’s choice to become a woman?”
I’m not presuming to know whether or not there would be such an acceptance. I’m only pointing out that there are many people who presume to know something which they either cannot know at all or cannot presently know with the currently available evidence. Take the Batista Family as an example of how presuming to know what another person’s appropriate religious conduct should be can prove to be entirely wrong and sinful prejudice. Put yourself in their place.
A Batista child is born with all of their outwardly normal appearances of a baby girl. She is raised as a girl. She behaves like a girl. Upon reaching the age of puberty, this girl’s genitalia and overall physique takes on a distinctly male appearance and function. This former girl and now a boy at age 13 and older lives as a boy and a man, marries a woman, and fathers children.
Given those events and facts, describe how you would describe this person’s moral behavior as a member of a Christian church and in relation to God’s Commandments. In other words, do you deem this person to have been morally delinquent while dressing and living as a girl before the onset of puberty, during the period of time while in natural transition between being a a girl and then a boy, or after becoming a boy and a man fathering children? How do you deem this person’s moral compliance or delinquency in the event he should decide to revert to living as the female he was before puberty caused his transformation into a male?
Is there any rational basis for this spontaneous human sex change scenario other than BBC anecdotes ? I know the trannies would love it - I mean with mentally normal individuals.