[Springfield Reformer]

I find it interesting that your apparent source:

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3307-binding-and-loosing

... would use the discredited Pseudo-Clementine Writings to validate a Roman Catholic theory of binding and loosing, as well as formal transmission of the same to next generation leaders.  Maybe they just don't know? But then maybe this is sort of like the justification for Dan Rather's spurious memo of memogate fame?  Fake but accurate?  Or maybe not so accurate. Very confusing why either of you would use it.

So, setting aside the fake Clementine novel, do you have any divinely inspired text to back your claims?  

Peace,

SR

[metmom]

Ouch.....

[RnMomof7]

< grin >

[daniel1212]

I find it interesting that your apparent source: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3307-binding-and-loosing ... would use the discredited Pseudo-Clementine Writings to validate a Roman Catholic theory of binding and loosing,

Which would not be the first time RCs made use of fabrications that fooled others for some time .

Thank God for your catching it.