Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN; BlueDragon
Why would a catholic apologist not address the assertions in the paragraph yet try to infer the quote is either erroneous or deceitful?

For the exact same reason that I posted the last three or four times you asked me this question.I have not verified for myself the accuracy of the quote. I have not read the quote myself in context. I don't know if the author was quoting someone else, nor do I know if the author was engaging in hyperbole or taking poetic liberty.

You just inferred I was being deceitful to not have a catholic verify the quote.

First off as the sender of the post I can't "infer" anything, I can "imply", but I did not. It is up to you as the recipient to "infer." I would advise against that since it would constitute mind reading. Second It sounds like someone is either projecting or has a guilty conscience.

Let me give you a perfect example. Are you aware that the Bile itself denies the very existence of God? It is right there in Psalm 14:1 ...There is no God...

My statement is 100% accurate, yet taken in context it says the exact opposite.

306 posted on 07/12/2015 11:50:16 AM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: verga

Why don’t you try quoting the Bible for defense of the RCC dogmas? You could start witht he adoration of Mary as a mediatrix helping Jesus get His High Priest role accomplished. where would I look to find that in scriptures?


307 posted on 07/12/2015 11:53:02 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson