To: Moonmad27
Do you think that many of the Catholic threads that are sometimes posted are historical and educational? Thus to be honest, they must include the Protestant part too.
It’s not bashing non-Catholics to post the facts as shown in history.
231 posted on
07/19/2015 2:03:39 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Salvation; Moonmad27
It’s not bashing non-Catholics to post the facts as shown in history.That is LOL funny. It is "catholic bashing" if protestants post their history. Not the other way.
To: Salvation
Nor is it “bashing” to post the known history of Catholicism.
But Catholics don’t seem to see it that way.
249 posted on
07/19/2015 2:13:44 PM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Salvation
Do you think that many of the Catholic threads that are sometimes posted are historical and educational? Thus to be honest, they must include the Protestant part too. It’s not bashing non-Catholics to post the facts as shown in history.
The debates on FR have shown that those facts you speak of are not always facts...As such, it is not bashing when non Catholics present biblical and historical evidence showing where your religion errs...
I do not believe the edict was to stifle debate...
536 posted on
07/19/2015 5:03:07 PM PDT by
Iscool
To: Salvation
Do you think that many of the Catholic threads that are sometimes posted are historical and educational? Thus to be honest, they must include the Protestant part too. It’s not bashing non-Catholics to post the facts as shown in history.Does that mean you will not be posting the Luther cereal box cartoon any more? LOL! :-)
666 posted on
07/19/2015 6:32:39 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson