Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg; MHGinTN
It’s odd to Sola Scriptura people, I guess. I think Sola Scriptura is an untenable position in its strict construction, so it’s not odd to me.

I suppose that it depends on whose definition of sS you are using.

There's a world of difference between what born again believers actually believe it to be and what many Catholics claim that born again believers believe it to be.

Most of what I've seen Catholics claim it is, isn't at all what those of us who hold the Bible as authoritative believe.

655 posted on 07/23/2015 12:57:10 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
When I say the phrase, my first thought is this from the Articles of Religion of the C. of E.
HOLY Scripture containeth all things necessary to salvation: so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of any man, that it should be believed as an article of the Faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salvation. In the name of the holy Scripture we do understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, of whose authority was never any doubt in the Church.

663 posted on 07/23/2015 1:07:03 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson