Ven. Anne Catherine Emmerich on The Church of Darkness

Novus Ordo Watch ^ | Unknown | Staff

[mlizzy]

I read the Doloris Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Fascinating reading.

---

Thank you!

http://www.jesus-passion.com/DOLOROUS_PASSION_OF_OUR_LORD_JESUS_CHRIST.htm

[piusv]

Are you Jewish or Catholic? The Catholic Church traditionally condemns active participation in non-Catholic worship. I get that the post-Vatican II popes disregard all that outdated stuff, but Ven. Anne Catherine Emmerich knew Traditional Catholicism.

[Slyfox]

You are quite welcome. I spent years reading the two volume biography on her and the “Life of Jesus Christ” from which the movie “The Passion of the Christ” was taken. Her words on Christ’s life are like seeing the video of His life, whereas reading Scripture is like just having access to the photos.

[ronnietherocket3]

Are you Jewish or Catholic?

Catholic, which would be obvious from reading my tag line.

I get that the post-Vatican II popes disregard all that outdated stuff, but Ven. Anne Catherine Emmerich knew Traditional Catholicism.

Traditional Catholicism also taught that the magisterial authority of the Pope outranked that of someone who is not even a deacon.

[piusv]

Huh. Where does traditional Catholic teaching state that popes have the authority to commit scandal or teach heresy? Please do quote it.

[ronnietherocket3]

Huh. Where does traditional Catholic teaching state that popes have the authority to commit scandal or teach heresy? Please do quote it.

Your statement starts off with the assumption that you know Catholic doctrine better than the popes since Vatican II. You have fallen into a similar trap to the one that Martin Luther and John Calvin fell into.

[piusv]

Still, rather than dodging, provide the pre-Vatican II support for popes actively participating in non-Catholic religions. I’m sure if this was always allowed in the Church you can find it.

[ronnietherocket3]

Still, rather than dodging, provide the pre-Vatican II support for popes actively participating in non-Catholic religions. I’m sure if this was always allowed in the Church you can find it.

I don't need to. Satan does not run the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church did not change at Vatican II.

[piusv]

Sure it did. You just refuse to see it.

If it didn’t change, then you would have no problem finding support for popes or any Catholic actively participating in non-Catholic worship. On the contrary, there is nothing but the opposite.

Catholics who admit something’s gone awry make a point of trying to understand why/how it happened and how to respond to it. Others continue to turn a blind eye.

[ronnietherocket3]

Catholics who admit something’s gone awry make a point of trying to understand why/how it happened and how to respond to it. Others continue to turn a blind eye.

Protestants took something holy, Scripture, and elevated it above everything else by the perverse doctrine of Sola Scriptura. SVs take something holy, the Magisterium, and elevate it above everything by Solum Magisterium. Like Protestants, they kick out the things they don't like. However, when debating Protestants, there is at least a defined and finite canon to argue over. No such thing exists with Sedevacantism. Sedevacantists are eternally able to dredge up obscure documents or private comments and pluck things out of context.

[piusv]

Meanwhile, while you continue to attack in an ignorant fashion, you can’t respond to the very simple question: where in the first 1960 years of Church teaching does the Catholic Church allow Catholics to actively participate in non-Catholic worship?

When you can answer that question, get back to me.