He could have copied “See Spot Run” and dedicated it the same way..
You give a lot of credence to his scribblings. I don’t.
No worries.
I give no credence to Satan nor Alinksy’s or your writings. They all are the same.
Many people don't, which is why we have ended up in such a collectively deplorable state and those of us who adhere to traditional values are being forced back on all fronts by the savant's of Satan's methodology.
I don't take the article to declare that the Vatican operatives in question are adherents to Alinksy himself per se, although it is hardly a stretch of the imagination to suppose that men in the business of politics, well-educated men at least, would be intimately familiar with his writings, just as they would familiar with the works of Machiavelli and Guicciardini.
It is not a coincidence that the left has been rolling with more collective success in nearly every quarter (political, national, ecclesiastical) in the past century than at any other time. Their suddenly apparent success has been the result of a long and oft invisible campaign going back much further in history. Alinsky merely synthesized all the tactics of political and cultural agitation and subversion into one handy, easy-to-use reference that can be applied (with varying degrees of panache and refinement) by common rabble-rousers and international theorists alike. In that sense, the Vatican operatives in question are Acolytes of Saul Alinsky, even if they aren't following his edition of Satan's playbook.
In any event, why do you take such issue with what is, overall, the most superficial facet of the article? No offense, but your grand arrival to the comment section of this article is reminiscent of a belligerent drunk bellying up to a bar. I rather get the sense that you looking to ruffle feathers for your own amusement.