[editor-surveyor]

Paul was most certainly no hypocrite!

His opposition to circumcision was for those that were not of the circumcision. Timothy was of the circumcision.

Luke was not a witness to the events of which he wrote in his gospel; he was merely writing as Peter’s scribe, thus it was really the gospel according to Peter that he wrote.

[ravenwolf]

Paul was most certainly no hypocrite!

---

If Peter was a hypocrite Paul was a hypocrite.
Plus Paul slandered peter.

Luke was not a witness to the events of which he wrote in his gospel; he was merely writing as Peter’s scribe, thus it was really the gospel according to Peter that he wrote.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Luke also accompanied Paul probably later and some believe was even converted by Paul.