If you show a clear verse that supports what the appiration claims let's see it or you've got nothing.
Which of course, is a fallacious charge and figure, while RCs also determine the validity of teaching based upon their judgment of conformity with historical writings, and are part of an amalgam of members with varying beliefs, all treated as members by Rome, which shows her interpretation of her beliefs thereby.
Under both sola Scriptura (wholly inspired Scripture alone being the supreme standard for faith and morals, but which provides for helps, etc.) and sola ecclesia (the infallible if non-inspired Church alone being the supreme standard for faith and morals) you have both unity and disunity, with those who esteem Scripture most strongly being the most conservative and unified in basics, and the question is which is Scriptural?
Meaning did the church began under the RC model, in which the historical instruments and stewards of Divine revelation are the infallible authorities on Truth, by which we know what Scripture, etc. means?
>Or can souls be right following men whom such reject, but establish their truth claims upon Scriptural substantiation in word and in power? (Which does not militate against the magisterial office, but not as infallible.