Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

The teaching of the perpetual virginity of Mary does not rise or fall on one word, rather, a body of evidence from other sources such as: Mary’s question to the angel as to how a betrothed virgin would conceive; Jesus entrusting Mary to the care of a non-blood relative at this death; and also the long witness of ancient Tradition.
1 posted on 03/12/2016 9:36:07 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping from OSV column.


2 posted on 03/12/2016 9:37:23 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

No Biblical evidence that dear Mary remained a virgin after the birth of Christ.
No evidence any Apostle believed it.
No prophecy requires it.
To remain a virgin is a violation of God’s expressed command to be fruitful and multiply.
To remain a virgin is a violation of God’s expressed desire that married couples have sex.

It is, in short, made up out of whole cloth.

Simply an attempt to make Mary a demigoddess.


3 posted on 03/12/2016 9:41:29 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (BREAKING.... Vulgarian Resistance begins attack on the GOPe Death Star.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

So your interpretation here is that in this context “until” meant “never did”?


4 posted on 03/12/2016 9:42:35 AM PST by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
The teaching of the perpetual virginity of Mary does not rise or fall on one word, rather, a body of evidence from other sources such as: Mary’s question to the angel as to how a betrothed virgin would conceive; Jesus entrusting Mary to the care of a non-blood relative at this death; and also the long witness of ancient Tradition.

A simple reading of the Word in context will clear this up.

Mary’s question to the angel as to how a betrothed virgin would conceive

26Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city in Galilee called Nazareth, 27to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the descendants of David; and the virgin’s name was Mary. 28And coming in, he said to her, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.” 29But she was very perplexed at this statement, and kept pondering what kind of salutation this was. 30The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have found favor with God. 31“And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. 32“He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.” 34Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” 35The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.

The meaning of the Greek in v34 is that Mary had not had not known a man sexually.

097 ginṓskō – properly, to know, especially through personal experience (first-hand acquaintance). 1097 /ginṓskō ("experientially know") is used for example in Lk 1:34, "And Mary [a virgin] said to the angel, 'How will this be since I do not know (1097 /ginṓskō = sexual intimacy) a man?'"Mary understood the birds and the bees.HELPS Word-studies

There is nothing...repeat NOTHING in this passage that ever remotely hints this was a pledge of perpetual virginity. NOTHING.

Jesus entrusting Mary to the care of a non-blood relative at this death

The passage in John where Jesus entrusts Mary to John has nothing to do with the issue of virginity. It is well established in the Word that Joseph and Mary had other children.

Perhaps if the msgr knew his Greek a little better he'd understand this in context.

The appeal to "Tradition" is dismissed. If the catholic is appealing to the protoevangelium of James they are really on very, very thin ground.

6 posted on 03/12/2016 9:48:51 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

Never let the text of scripture interfere with your presuppositions. It makes theology much more interesting.


15 posted on 03/12/2016 9:57:31 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
That's a good step to base your beliefs on the Bible itself and not the doctrines of man or a church.

Now, I'm not at all familiar with Catholic doctrine, but I do know the Bible. I never heard of this false doctrine. Yes, it contradicts the Bible. Jesus had brothers and sisters. (John 7:5, Mark 3:31-32, Mat 12:47, Mat 13:55-56, Mark 6:3) There's no indication that Joseph had any other wife than Mary.

You'll also find that Mary spoke with tongues in Acts 1:14 and Acts 2:3.

And you can be sure that apostle Peter had a wife, because Jesus healed her mother in Matthew 8:14-15.

There will be those that will say "brethren" mean "kinfolk", but that's a real stretch. You may was well say that "his wife's mother" in Matthew 8:14 refers to the mother of Jesus' wife.

23 posted on 03/12/2016 10:11:17 AM PST by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

I think Mary should be revered but not worshiped.


25 posted on 03/12/2016 10:13:50 AM PST by Yuri Orinko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

And what about Jesus’ brothers?

It’s very dangerous for a Catholic to read his bible and take it’s word over church tradition. They might end up disagreeing with the “Holy Father”.

The very term “Holy Father” should not be used of a man, Matt 23:9


33 posted on 03/12/2016 10:37:52 AM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
The teaching of the perpetual virginity of Mary does not rise or fall on one word

That is why when added with:

and so on one gets a more complete picture that, yes, there were other step brothers and sisters of our Lord.
130 posted on 03/12/2016 2:19:11 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Now, I wonder if our belief does not contradict the Bible

Read some MORE of your 'beliefs' and increase your 'wondering'...



As regards the oft-quoted Mt. 16:18

 

Augustine, sermon:

"Christ, you see, built his Church not on a man but on Peter's confession. What is Peter's confession? 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' There's the rock for you, there's the foundation, there's where the Church has been built, which the gates of the underworld cannot conquer.John Rotelle, O.S.A., Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine , © 1993 New City Press, Sermons, Vol III/6, Sermon 229P.1, p. 327

Upon this rock, said the Lord, I will build my Church. Upon this confession, upon this that you said, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God,' I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not conquer her (Mt. 16:18). John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City, 1993) Sermons, Volume III/7, Sermon 236A.3, p. 48.

 

Augustine, sermon:

For petra (rock) is not derived from Peter, but Peter from petra; just as Christ is not called so from the Christian, but the Christian from Christ. For on this very account the Lord said, 'On this rock will I build my Church,' because Peter had said, 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.' On this rock, therefore, He said, which thou hast confessed, I will build my Church. For the Rock (Petra) was Christ; and on this foundation was Peter himself built. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Christ Jesus. The Church, therefore, which is founded in Christ received from Him the keys of the kingdom of heaven in the person of Peter, that is to say, the power of binding and loosing sins. For what the Church is essentially in Christ, such representatively is Peter in the rock (petra); and in this representation Christ is to be understood as the Rock, Peter as the Church. — Augustine Tractate CXXIV; Philip Schaff, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: First Series, Volume VII Tractate CXXIV (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf107.iii.cxxv.html)

 

Augustine, sermon:

And Peter, one speaking for the rest of them, one for all, said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Mt 16:15-16)...And I tell you: you are Peter; because I am the rock, you are Rocky, Peter-I mean, rock doesn't come from Rocky, but Rocky from rock, just as Christ doesn't come from Christian, but Christian from Christ; and upon this rock I will build my Church (Mt 16:17-18); not upon Peter, or Rocky, which is what you are, but upon the rock which you have confessed. I will build my Church though; I will build you, because in this answer of yours you represent the Church. — John Rotelle, O.S.A. Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City Press, 1993), Sermons, Volume III/7, Sermon 270.2, p. 289

 

Augustine, sermon:

Peter had already said to him, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' He had already heard, 'Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona, because flesh and blood did not reveal it to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the underworld shall not conquer her' (Mt 16:16-18)...Christ himself was the rock, while Peter, Rocky, was only named from the rock. That's why the rock rose again, to make Peter solid and strong; because Peter would have perished, if the rock hadn't lived. — John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City, 1993) Sermons, Volume III/7, Sermon 244.1, p. 95

 

Augustine, sermon:

...because on this rock, he said, I will build my Church, and the gates of the underworld shall not overcome it (Mt. 16:18). Now the rock was Christ (1 Cor. 10:4). Was it Paul that was crucified for you? Hold on to these texts, love these texts, repeat them in a fraternal and peaceful manner. — John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City Press, 1995), Sermons, Volume III/10, Sermon 358.5, p. 193

 

Augustine, Psalm LXI:

Let us call to mind the Gospel: 'Upon this Rock I will build My Church.' Therefore She crieth from the ends of the earth, whom He hath willed to build upon a Rock. But in order that the Church might be builded upon the Rock, who was made the Rock? Hear Paul saying: 'But the Rock was Christ.' On Him therefore builded we have been. — Philip Schaff, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), Volume VIII, Saint Augustin, Exposition on the Book of Psalms, Psalm LXI.3, p. 249. (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf108.ii.LXI.html)

 

• Augustine, in “Retractions,”

In a passage in this book, I said about the Apostle Peter: 'On him as on a rock the Church was built.'...But I know that very frequently at a later time, I so explained what the Lord said: 'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church,' that it be understood as built upon Him whom Peter confessed saying: 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,' and so Peter, called after this rock, represented the person of the Church which is built upon this rock, and has received 'the keys of the kingdom of heaven.' For, 'Thou art Peter' and not 'Thou art the rock' was said to him. But 'the rock was Christ,' in confessing whom, as also the whole Church confesses, Simon was called Peter. But let the reader decide which of these two opinions is the more probable. — The Fathers of the Church (Washington D.C., Catholic University, 1968), Saint Augustine, The Retractations Chapter 20.1:.

 

152 posted on 03/12/2016 4:39:45 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Now, I wonder if our belief does not contradict the Bible

Do you 'believe' this??


 
 
 
 

"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours."

--Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)

153 posted on 03/12/2016 4:40:55 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
In Scripture, too, we encounter “until” being used merely to indicate an indefinite period whose conditions may or may not be met. Thus, we read, “And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child until the day of her death” (2 Sam 6:23). Of course, this should not be taken to mean that she started having children after she died. If I say to you in English that Christ “must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (1 Cor 15:25), I do not mean his everlasting kingdom will actually end thereafter.

Then why didn't the Holy Spirit inspire the gospel writers to say, "Joseph knew her not until the day he died."? Wouldn't that dispel any doubt about Mary's perpetual virginity?

228 posted on 03/12/2016 10:23:33 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
RCs as you keep on trying to promote your heretical organization with such fallacious sources that they are an argument against being an RC.

In Scripture, too, we encounter “until” being used merely to indicate an indefinite period whose conditions may or may not be met. Thus, we read, “And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child until the day of her death” (2 Sam 6:23). Of course, this should not be taken to mean that she started having children after she died

The word used in your translation as "until" ("unto" in the KJV) means "even to" 497 times, ("That I will not take from a thread even to a shoelatchet" - Gen_14:23) "unto" 1,253 times (the same is the father of the Moabites unto this day." - Gen_19:7) and with the context of your verse makes it obvious this is saying "even to the day of her death" since after there would be no more opportunity to produce offspring.

In contrast, if the text said And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child until her year of marriage" them it would clearly convey that she had children, especially since leaving and cleaving is what describes marriage in Scripture, and if any of her in the light of the fact that the Holy Spirit characteristically mentions exceptions to the norm, even in regards to lesser subjects, from great age (Methuselah), to excess size (Goliath), strength (Samson), extraordinary height (Ogg) or toes (sons of Goliath), or holiness (Job, Noah, Daniel) chastity (Anna), diet (John the Baptist), to the supernatural transport of Phillip, the singleness of Paul and Barnabas, and uncharacteristic duplicity of Peter, and the surpassing labor and suffering of Paul, etc. and Christ being sinless, etc.

And the example of the barren womb of Michal is another testimony to that fact, and thus it is actually an argument against the perpetual virginity of Mary.

If I say to you in English that Christ “must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (1 Cor 15:25), I do not mean his everlasting kingdom will actually end thereafter.

Which is another fallacious use of Scripture, since the subject is not even the everlasting kingdom, but that of Christ functionally reigning as Lord, which the Father made Him due to His victorious mission:

For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, Until I make thy foes thy footstool. Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. (Acts 2:34-36)

Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. (1 Corinthians 15:24-25)

...But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted which did put all things under him. And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all. (1 Corinthians 15:27-28)

Meaning that the Divine Son of God shall deliver "up the kingdom to God, even the Father" and the latter shall once again functionally assume the Lordship that is consistent with His headship overall. And all will give glory to God, whether in salvation or in judgment, including many Catholics who insist on basically giving to Mary the following as to Christ:

Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing. And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever. And the four beasts said, Amen. And the four and twenty elders fell down and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever. (Revelation 5:12-14)

274 posted on 03/13/2016 10:40:12 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I have yet to hear on this thread why it is so critical to the faith of Roman Catholics that Mary was a perpetual virgin. I’ve seen some say that it was to fulfill an OT prophecy in an allegorical sense, but that seems suspect.

So, to you Roman Catholics, WHY is this a dogma of the Roman Catholic church? WHY do you believe your faith hangs in the balance over this doctrine? I ask in all earnestness.


293 posted on 03/13/2016 12:21:49 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

It ain't no fun . . . I'll tell you that.

Sorry . . . couldn't resist! ;-)

513 posted on 03/14/2016 6:47:35 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Demontfort:

16. God the Father gave his only Son to the world only through Mary. Whatever desires the patriarchs may have cherished, whatever entreaties the prophets and saints of the Old Law may have had for 4,000 years to obtain that treasure, it was Mary alone who merited it and found grace before God by the power of her prayers and the perfection of her virtues. "The world being unworthy," said Saint Augustine, "to receive the Son of God directly from the hands of the Father, he gave his Son to Mary for the world to receive him from her."

The Son of God became man for our salvation but only in Mary and through Mary.

God the Holy Spirit formed Jesus Christ in Mary but only after having asked her consent through one of the chief ministers of his court.

518 posted on 03/14/2016 7:00:55 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mark17; boatbums; metmom; Alex Murphy

A reading:

Exodus 32:1 When the people saw that Moses delayed to come down from the mountain, the people gathered themselves together to Aaron and said to him, “Up, make us gods who shall go before us. As for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him.” 2 So Aaron said to them, “Take off the rings of gold that are in the ears of your wives, your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me.” 3 So all the people took off the rings of gold that were in their ears and brought them to Aaron. 4 And he received the gold from their hand and fashioned it with a graving tool and made a golden calf. And they said, “These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!” 5 When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it. And Aaron made a proclamation and said, “Tomorrow shall be a feast to the Lord.” 6 And they rose up early the next day and offered burnt offerings and brought peace offerings. And the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up dto play.

7 And the Lord said to Moses, “Go down, for your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves.

21And Moses said to Aaron, “What did this people do to you that you have brought such a great sin upon them?” 22 And Aaron said, “Let not the anger of my lord burn hot. You know the people, that they are set on evil.


655 posted on 03/15/2016 10:30:38 AM PDT by Gamecock ( Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul...Matthew 10:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

The title threw me


830 posted on 03/19/2016 7:00:26 AM PDT by wardaddy (Cruz path to nomination is a box canyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson