Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

“God created women to want sex, too, despite rumors to the contrary.

“I can just imagine how it would blow certain minds to think that Mary........”

Although I firmly believe from Scripture that Jesus had siblings, it’s fact that women have sex all the time with no child to show for it.


364 posted on 03/13/2016 3:53:37 PM PDT by SouthernClaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]


To: SouthernClaire; kosciusko51; imardmd1; Elsie; daniel1212; metmom
A diversion is being played, to draw attention away from the heresies glare out of catholiciism. When asked why the perpetual virginity is so important to catholiciism dogma, the question is deflected with why is it so important that Mary be a virgin before the birth of Jesus. Reminds me of satan in the Garden, 'hath god really said'?

There is a very important biological reason why Mary was identified as a Virgin before the conceiving in her womb. So long as confusion can be spread like peanut butter, the notion that God used a sex cell (gamete) from Mary to make Jesus can be sustained in catholic myth mongering. Actual human conceptiuon usually takes place in the fallopian tube and rarely in the uterus since the geography does not lend itself to the male and female gametes actually find one another. The fallopian tube is a restricted passage ...

Further, the Bible says that, [Matt1:20 After he had thought about it, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream. “Joseph, son of David,” he said, “don’t be afraid to take Mary as your wife, because what has been conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to name him Jesus, because he is the one who will save his people from their sins.”] what is conceived in Mary's womb is of the Holy Spirit, not sired by the Holy Spirit, as if a God sex cell was united to a Mary sex cell, but that the being, His entire being, is of the Holy Spirit.

But wait, there's more!

367 posted on 03/13/2016 4:08:46 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

To: SouthernClaire

However, except in ONE case, having children proves that the woman had sex.


369 posted on 03/13/2016 4:10:35 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

To: SouthernClaire; kosciusko51; imardmd1; daniel1212; metmom
IF a virgin is found with child (and it can happen in the mammalian kingdom) the offspring is sex cell related to only the mother and is a female offspring. The Bible prophesied that a virgin being found pregnant with a son would be the sign unto the Jews of Messiah's arriving. ... There wasn't any in vitro fertilization 2000 years ago. So, for a virgin to conceive in her womb a son, either the son is super naturally there (not by any union of sex cells, gametes) OR God used one of the Mother's gametes and provided a gamete of His OWn. Catholiciism would like to float that latter notion to raise Mary to goddesshood.

But wait, there's still more!

373 posted on 03/13/2016 4:31:22 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

To: SouthernClaire; kosciusko51; imardmd1; metmom; daniel1212; Elsie; verga; af_vet_1981; rwa265; ...
And finally, God conceived Jesus in Mary's unopened womb. The entire Being Who built His own body (the mother builds nothing of the gestating child, btw, not even the amniotic sac) while protected and nourished in Mary's body got to that location by The Holy Spirit. His entire DNA was God formed, not a smidgeon of it was donated by Mary. BUT wait, the miracles don't end there!

I truly believe, though I have no means to show it in scritpture directly, that Mary gestated Jesus and at the end of nine months God brought Jesus from her body in such a way that she was still a virgin for her HUSBAND Joseph. Jesus left the tomb without rolli8ng away the stone, He could leave Mary's womb without passing along the birth canal. I personally believe this because Mary was betrothed to Joseph and if God used Her birth canal she would no longer be virginal for her husband, having had the biological 'seal' broken. God would not cheat Joseph!

375 posted on 03/13/2016 4:47:07 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson