How Not to Interpret Scripture

There is a class that most college students will take at one point in their academic career. It is the course on Western Civilization—“Western Civ” for short. It is a feeble attempt to supplement the modern college curriculum (typically in two freshman-level courses) with what used to be the very backbone of a liberal education. The course revolves around classics of the Western Tradition: Plato’s Republic, Virgil’s Aeneid, Augustine’s Confessions, Descartes’ Meditations, and Locke’s Second Treatise on Government. But one text in particular, I think, has been subject to mistreatment and misuse—the Holy Bible.

The problem is simple. One of the goals of the Western Civilization class is to teach students the ways in which certain texts have shaped the world in which we live. This often does not happen within the modern secular university.

The reason for this is that most people charged with teaching such classes have been deeply steeped within the modern worldview; as such, their understanding of scripture is quite different from the approach that shaped the ancient and medieval world. Typically, there are three ways to understand scripture available to the modern mind—none of these are true to the actual historical reading of the Bible; more importantly, none of these accurately reflect the way in which the Bible has been understood within the Catholic intellectual tradition.

The first of these three approaches to scripture is fundamentalism. This view, which has been popular in America for over a century, is a byproduct of the Protestant rejection of the interpretive tradition of the Catholic Church. Instead of relying on a tradition of apostolic tradition (full of flawed human beings, to be sure) or on the powers of human reason (which are often mistaken) to aid in our understanding of God’s Word, the fundamentalist view simply accepts all passages of the Bible as literal, historical truths. If the genealogy from Adam suggests that the world is 6000 years old, so be it—regardless of what human reason, through the sciences of geology, biology, anthropology, and all the rest may say. The word of God is meant to be taken literally at every step—and our faith demands that we reject our own reason when it conflicts with this literalistic approach to the scriptures.

While this approach to scripture is somewhat influential throughout America, the second approach is constantly growing in popularity among those with a weak background in theology and history, and especially among those who spend a considerable amount of time on the internet (i.e., the young). It is largely derivative of the fundamentalist view, except it is highly antagonistic in nature. This approach to scripture is largely characterized by a highly uncharitable reading of various passages with the intention to undermine their moral, spiritual, or religious authority. Popular authors like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, and popular figures in entertainment like Bill Maher are spokesmen for this approach.

“You expect me to believe that snakes can talk? Or that ‘the first day’ could have existed before the creation of celestial bodies? How childish, how absurd,” they say, without ever attempting to penetrate the text in pursuit of deeper, spiritual, truths.

This view, while rarely endorsed by college faculty (for even most unchurched professors understand how anti-intellectual it actually is) is nevertheless very popular on college campuses due to the combination of theologically uneducated youths, the internet (where misinformation abounds), and a desire to view oneself as intellectually superior; picking on “people of faith” is an easy target when one thinks that such people are naive, superstitious, and simply irrational, given the assumption that everything in the Bible is to be understood (by people of faith) to be literal, unambiguous, scientific, historical truth.

The final approach to scripture encountered on college campuses, while certainly more intellectually respectable, is equally unhelpful when trying to gain an understanding of the way in which scripture shaped our world. This is the historical-critical method, developed in the early modern period by philosophers like Benedict Spinoza. Writing in a period of religious persecution and widespread theological controversy, Spinoza argued that biblical scholars should read scripture as if it were not the word of God—as if the many books of the Bible had no collective unity, no overall meaning as a whole, no purpose beyond what the human author, in his own historically limited view of the world, could have intended.

This became the model of all secular Biblical interpretation within modern universities—the Bible was a collection of ancient writings, stemming from particular and contingent historical circumstances, which could give us insight into ancient Jewish and Christian thought, but is not necessarily reflective of any higher, deeper truths.

The problem with all of these approaches, at least, within a Western Civilization class, is that they are peculiarly modern. That is, they are entirely inappropriate for understanding the way in which the Bible shaped the Western world within the context of ancient and medieval history, which is typically the context in which they are examined.

If the goal of a Western Civilization class is to help students understand the way in which these texts have shaped the world; if it is to involve them in the great conversation that extends back to the fathers of our Western culture, we ought to teach our students how the great minds within the Catholic intellectual tradition understood the word of God, as it was this Catholic tradition that shaped the West.

Students are often surprised to find that St. Augustine, an ancient Roman in a world of pagan superstition, argued that the creation stories in Genesis are not to be understood as scientific, cosmological truths. They are puzzled by the fact that Aquinas, a medieval monk, praises reason, philosophy, and science in addition to faith. This is a product of their lack of exposure to the very worldview that produced Christendom—a blind spot in the college education of many.

The approach to scripture that transformed the Western world is one in which the whole of the scriptures is interpreted through the lens of the Word of God incarnate. God, it is revealed to us, is Truth and Love. Therefore nothing within his revelation can contradict Truth and Love—any interpretation of the Bible that is contrary to the light of human reason or that contradicts the law of love cannot be from God.

Contrary to fundamentalism, our faith, and the scripture in which it is revealed, is not contrary to reason. Contrary to the critics of fundamentalism, we do not treat faith as an anti-intellectual substitute for reason. Contrary to the historical-critical method, the Bible is an integrated whole that cannot be understood merely by an analysis of its parts.

This leads to the last misunderstanding about the scriptures. It is not the Bible alone that serves as the basis for our faith; rather, the Bible is only at home within the Church, with its long apostolic tradition, a tradition of authoritative interpretation that can be traced to Jesus himself. In the Acts of the Apostles, the Ethiopian eunuch could not understand the scriptures until Phillip—an apostle, charged with authority by Christ—interpreted them for him.

It is rare that this apostolic, Catholic approach to Biblical interpretation is offered to students at our modern, secular universities. Thus, the graduates of these universities may ultimately become ignorant of the understanding of scripture that shaped the world in which we live. The approach to the Bible that produced the West as we know it—an approach that looks for deeper, spiritual meanings, transcending the letter of the text, as part of a holistic revelation of the God that is Truth and Love—is often missing from the college curriculum. This is true even in a course like “Western Civilization,” which places such importance on history, interpretation, and the roots of our culture.

>>>>This leads to the last misunderstanding about the scriptures. It is not the Bible alone that serves as the basis for our faith; rather, the Bible is only at home within the Church, with its long apostolic tradition, a tradition of authoritative interpretation that can be traced to Jesus himself. In the Acts of the Apostles, the Ethiopian eunuch could not understand the scriptures until Phillip—an apostle, charged with authority by Christ—interpreted them for him.<<<<

#1 - The Eunuch was spiritually dead. The Word is spiritually discerned. This was God’s Grace in action for a sincere seeker of His Truth, so that he might be saved - God will pour water on thirsty ground (Isaiah 44:3). NOTE - Philip did NOT stay with him after he was baptized. The eunuch continued on with the Word (OT) that he had, while Philip was translated to another place to continue preaching the Gospel. Philip leading the eunuch to Christ is not a model for spiritual growth of a Believer who is - to desire the sincere milk of the WORD that you may grow. (1 Peter 2:2) Jesus encouraged the little children to come to HIM, not to organized religion. And the Kingdom of God must be received like a little child. (Matthew 18:3, 19:14, Mark 10:15, Luke 18:17) Meditate on those verses for a time. Paul writes to the Corinthian assembly that they needed milk and not solid food because they were not spiritual. He did not teach them human wisdom, but instead God’s Word. (1 Corinthians 2 & 3) It is the entrance of the Word that gives Light, even to the simple. (Psalm 119:130)

#2 - It is the “long apostolic tradition” which gave the world some of the darkest centuries of Christendom, with persecution, torture, and murder of those who dared to disagree with the state religion. It gave us Bible bans, and burnings, keeping the Word out of the hands of Believers. It was for similar religious traditions and hypocrisy that Jesus condemned the religious leaders of his time - “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” (Matthew 23) Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men... (Matthew 15, Mark 7)

#3 - What did Paul tell Timothy - “Preach the Word.” He wrote the Corinthians that they, “preach the Word of God with sincerity and with Christ’s authority.” And to the Roman assembly that the “Word is first in your mouth and then in your heart - the Word of faith we preach.” Throughout the time of Acts they “preached the Word to the Jews first, and then the Gentiles.” Its the Word that transforms lives, not religious tradition. Jesus gave us the Father’s Word, not ceremonies and traditions. (John 17) And after Paul received the Revelation of the Mystery, it was the Truth that by Grace we are saved by faith, Blessed with all Spiritual Blessings and seated in Heavenly places in Christ Jesus! You cannot know this Truth except by hearing the Word. (Ephesians 1 - 3) Too many religious folks have never received this wonderful Revelation.

#4 - Romans 10:17 - So faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the Word of Christ. If you claim that, “It is not the Bible alone that serves as the basis for our faith.” You are contradicting God’s Word. No one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ, the Living Word. He is the author and finisher of our faith! (Isaiah 28:16, 1 Corinthians 3:11, Hebrews 12:2, 1 Peter 2) The Word is the incorruptible Seed with which we are Born Again! (1 Peter 1:18-25) It is the God-breathed Scriptures which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. (2 Timothy 3:14-17) What more could religion, religious reasoning, or their traditions add to that?

#5 - How did Jesus stop satanic temptation - “It is written...” How did he counter religious ignorance, “It is written...” How did he deflect religious attacks, “It is written...” How did he answer religious inquiries, “It is written...” It seems there might be a pattern. Maybe one day the theologians will figure it all out and explain it to the rest of us.

We are mightily blessed to live in a time of freedom, where the Word is readily available in a multitude of formats and languages. Technology has made it possible to search the Bible in ways that no theologian even 100 years ago could have ever imagined. There is no excuse for not daily digging into God’s Word and letting His Truth speak directly to you.

“...this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven.” — Matthew 16:17

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.