[MayflowerMadam]

You can spew pope-stuff ‘til the cows come home; it means nothing to non-Catholics. So you’ve wasted time and keystrokes. We believe the Bible; you believe a man/pope. Why don’t we just stipulate that our religions’ tenets are different, agree to disagree, and move on? I’m good with that. I get the concept of “free will of man, and I respect your choice.

[Elsie]

You can spew pope-stuff ‘til the cows come home; it means nothing to non-Catholics.

Wanna bet?

[daniel1212]

You can spew pope-stuff ‘til the cows come home; it means nothing to non-Catholics. So you’ve wasted time and keystrokes. We believe the Bible; you believe a man/pope. Why don’t we just stipulate that our religions’ tenets are different, agree to disagree, and move on? I’m good with that. I get the concept of “free will of man, and I respect your choice.

Actually, Elsie is not a Catholic, but was posting in parody as a "Catholic_Wannabe_Dude," arguing as they do. It is the latter who continue to post provocative distinctive Cath teachings, including arguing that since Rome gave us the Bible, which she is did not, then she is the authorative infallible interpreter of it, which logic invalidates the very NT church she presumes to represent, since it began in dissent from the historical magisterial stewards of Scripture.

However, it is the one true church, the corporate body of Christ, that testifies to the resurrection and thus to the living God, as it alone 100% always consists of born again believers, which is a result of the resurrection of Christ by faith in the resurrected Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to the glory of God, and to which Scripture testifies.