[HossB86]

JP II’s “catechism” is flawed. The Bible is not.

Then why do RCCs ignore the Bible and believe the CCC? Is not the CCC part of the accepted teaching of the RCC? If so, why does the RCC allow the teaching of error from what you call a "flawed" source? And isn't it called, "the Catechism of the Catholic Church," not "JP II's Catechism"?

I've been told over, and over, and over again that the RCC does not teach error; yet you indicate that a teaching source is flawed and thus the RCC DOES teach error.

It sounds to me as if the RCC is at odds with itself.

And thanks for confirming that the RCCs teachings are flawed.

Hoss

[ebb tide]

Nice try. JP II’s catechism in not RCC teaching. It’s first edition was recalled due to blatant heresy.

[ealgeone]

ebbtide: JP II’s “catechism” is flawed. The Bible is not.

>>Hoss: I've been told over, and over, and over again that the RCC does not teach error; yet you indicate that a teaching source is flawed and thus the RCC DOES teach error. <,

ebb...your debate skills need a little work.

You admit your own catechism is flawed!!!! I almost fell out of my chair with your admission of what Christians have known all along.