[Prince of Desmond]

shall be permitted at any time to withdraw with impunity from obedience and devotion to those thus promoted or elevated and to avoid them as warlocks, heathens, publicans, and heresiarchs (the same subject persons, nevertheless, remaining bound by the duty of fidelity and obedience to any future Bishops, Archbishops, Patriarchs, Primates, Cardinals and Roman Pontiff canonically entering). To the greater confusion, moreover, of those thus promoted or elevated, if these shall have wished to prolong their government and authority, they shall be permitted to request the assistance of the secular arm against these same individuals thus promoted or elevated; nor shall those who withdraw on this account, in the aforementioned circumstances, from fidelity and obedience to those thus promoted and elevated, be subject, as are those who tear the tunic of the Lord, to the retribution of any censures or penalties.

Again, all this is true enough---but nowhere does any of this state that we as private individuals have the right to make the binding determination that a particular prelate is a heretic, as opposed to simply being in error; that is for the Church and the Church alone to determine.

"Law is not a mere contractual order of things, but a participation in the will of God or Divine Providence, and a breach of it therefore requires the intervention of the lawful custodian and guardian of the law...Only the legitimate authority, as the founder of law and the representative of the supreme Ruler, is entitled to demand justice and inflict the necessary penalties on transgressors" (Augustine, Vol. 8, p. 69)

[piusv]

Again, all this is true enough---but nowhere does any of this state that we as private individuals have the right to make the binding determination that a particular prelate is a heretic, as opposed to simply being in error; that is for the Church and the Church alone to determine.

Prince, tell me who exactly in the post-Vatican II hierarchy will do this when there is yet one prelate to actually condemn AL (versus the ever-so-popular post Vatican II "ambiguous" canard) ?

[SGNA]

The citations I presented mean exactly what they state.

Come to your senses! These apostates and their false sect of Vatican-2 are NOT the Catholic Church, and their ideology is NOT the Catholic Faith!

Wojtyla in Benin, West Africa in 1993 meeting with voodoo witch doctors and on which occasion he worshiped their satanic snake gods [sic] by feeding them 'sacred orange peels' [sic].

Voodoo You Trust? Wojtyla's Betrayal of God in Benin