Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlatherNaut

You’re still stuck on the Cephas verse aren’t you? Cephas did not propose deviations to the Faith. Therefore you can not use it to support your “recognize and resist” position.


63 posted on 05/13/2016 2:44:24 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: piusv
You’re still stuck on the Cephas verse aren’t you? Cephas did not propose deviations to the Faith. Therefore you can not use it to support your “recognize and resist” position.

Yes, I am "stuck on" Sacred Scripture. St. Bellarmine is not the author. His speculations and opinions are interesting, but not to be substituted for God's Word on the subject of errant popes.

Cephas "was to be blamed" (Galatians 2:11). In that regard, he and Bergoglio are alike. We may therefore "resist" Bergoglio's anti-Christ scribblings and blather with a clear conscience. God is permitting him to run amok, and it is His prerogative to resolve the situation as He wills. Those who presume to be personally entitled to effectively excommunicate disobedient popes (and even declare that no legitimate pope has existed since 1958) are clearly trespassing on God's domain.

Where else in Sacred Scripture (besides Gal 2:11) does God directly treat of an errant pope?

64 posted on 05/13/2016 6:08:00 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson