[Prince of Desmond]

Imprudence and venial sin at best, not heresy. Francis' documents don't just contain errors of "imprudence". Francis has not merely "sinned" (as all popes and Catholics do).

But neither has Francis been formally denounced as a heretic. Until he is, we are only at liberty to regard him as being gravely in error---tainted by leftist thought and desperate to pander to the modernists.

I would appreciate it if you would stop saying that I call St Bellarmine a hypocrite. You keep using his "licit to resist" quote in the same way you use Galatians 2:11 to support your position: in error. If you'd like, I can prove that too.

I'm merely sharing what I perceive, pius. And if you feel you can prove your point, then please do. But I don't suppose you, me, or anyone else can change sacred Scripture or the writings of Church Doctors.

[piusv]

But neither has Francis been formally denounced as a heretic. Until he is, we are only at liberty to regard him as being gravely in error---tainted by leftist thought and desperate to pander to the modernists.

But the scripture you keep using to support this has nothing to do with denouncing a true pope being "gravely in error" in his preaching or in his doctrine. There is no Scriptural support for denouncing such a pope.

Do you understand this very critical distinction?