[verga]

Do you deny that you said this in post 604 If ever there was a beginning, they (He) began all at the same time...

I get crawled all over for using human terms and then you insult me when you use even less specific terms.

If it weren't for double standards, the non-Catholics wouldn't have any at all.

[ealgeone]

Still waiting on your proof the Council of Nicea issued a statement supporting your #160 post.

BTW, you're being crawled over for the false doctrine you posted in #160.

[ealgeone]

Do you deny you posted this?

When God came into existence there was nothing else all was void. His first thought must have been self awareness. The only possible outcome of an omnipotent being becoming self aware would be for that awareness to be a mirrored reflection or that omnipotent perfection.

When the second being instantly became sentient there was no longer the void, There was only the "Father." The "Father" loved the "Son" with a perfect all powerful love and the "Son" loved the "Father" with an identical love. The love that proceeded from both the "Father" and the "Son" was also Omnipotent and perfect. As the "Father" and "Son" are both sentient there love must be sentient as well. This sentience is the Holy Spirit.

[boatbums]

Okay...you know the difference between “if” and “when”, right?

[Iscool]

Do you deny that you said this in post 604 If ever there was a beginning, they (He) began all at the same time...

Of course I don't deny it...I wasn't suggesting there was a beginning...I was just putting things in terms where they could easily be grasped...

God didn't create a son in eternity...The Son was always there as part of the Trinity...

[Elsie]

You having trouble actually seeing the word IF in one statement?

[Elsie]

If it weren't for double standards, the non-Catholics wouldn't have any at all.

Quite Hillary-like.