Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philippine President-Elect’s Latest Insult Is Directed at Catholic Bishops
CNA/EWTN NEWS ^ | May 27, 2016 | CNA/EWTN NEWS

Posted on 05/27/2016 2:38:07 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: NYer

Thats ALL we need is a politician that has read and understands his Bible.


21 posted on 05/28/2016 7:07:44 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
1. It is, or ought to be, a pan-Christian concern.
2. We kwazy evangelicals see Christendom as a whole united by believing upon a Savior for salvation. It would be a mistake to be parochial beyond that — and yet the mistake is made daily.
3. Long standing custom doesn’t always equate to the wisest thing in the world to do before God.
4. It’s possible to throw the baby out with the bath water, yes; but that doesn’t make it invalid to try to throw out the bath water.

===========================================

1. True enough.

2. You may be "kwazy," but you might not be wrong.

3. Also true, but it also doesn't equate NOT to be the wisest thing in the world to do before God. Are YOU the judge of MY faith? I sure don't judge YOURS.

4. WHO decides what "bath water" warrants throwing out? Who gets to judge?
There were no Protestants until 1500 years after Jesus. If the Church had been THAT bad, why was there such a HUGE hiatus in time? The "author" of Protestantism was a defrocked, disgraced former PRIEST, so that must tell you that there MIGHT be a bit of sour grapes and anger there. MIGHT. MIGHT. MIGHT. MIGHT.

5. Why did the 1500-year-old church deserve to be totally bad? It seems to me that there HAD to be some things that weren't awful. CATHOLICS collated the Bible, not Protestants. Surely that was a good thing.

6. Besides, why would I judge anyone, Protestants or even Hindus? GOD is the judge, not me.

7. The Church started "correcting" things as far back at their FIRST "COUNSEL," the Counsel of Jerusalem, 69. A.D., where the Church declared that Gentiles did NOT have to be circumcised to follow Jesus.
There have been numerous counsels over the millenia.

8. There are and have been over 40,000 different Protestant denominations over the last 500 years, come, gone and still here. (Google) Surely Jesus didn't mean that to be. Maybe I'm wrong.

Or, maybe I am just kwazy!

.

Nice chatting with you, HTR.

22 posted on 05/28/2016 7:23:26 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

If the church was that bad, why was God that patient?

I think that’s a rather ungrateful question to ask. God was patient on similar time lines with the Hebrew people.

The whole idea of “protesting” in its best light is, protesting FOR the sake of Christ. This will, by implication, protest against things that militate against Christ. Christ Himself protested for God and against what the chief rabbis were doing to Judaism — it’s not a new notion.

Yes, yes, yes, there are going to be people who abuse the concept and do it to indulge themselves in inherently unholy things. Those people will, at best, end up being forgotten.

It’s a human failing to be so fond of other humans that they forget God.


23 posted on 05/28/2016 7:30:33 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
If the church was that bad, why was God that patient?
I didn't say that God was impatient. Please don't put words in my mouth.

I think that’s a rather ungrateful question to ask. God was patient on similar time lines with the Hebrew people.
Ungrateful? I disagree. We ARE allowed to ask questions, NOT be considered "ungrateful" for asking them and YOU are assuming that I am ungrateful in my question. That's an assumption you make without even knowing me. Not very nice.

The whole idea of “protesting” in its best light is, protesting FOR the sake of Christ. This will, by implication, protest against things that militate against Christ. Christ Himself protested for God and against what the chief rabbis were doing to Judaism — it’s not a new notion.
There ARE acceptable avenues of protest. Creating an entire 40,000 array of PROTESTING Christian off-shoots, as the Protestants did, may NOT have been appropriate. Some Protestant denominations even gave up the Jewish MALE-only leadership of a faith, female vicars. Hmmmm.

Yes, yes, yes, there are going to be people who abuse the concept and do it to indulge themselves in inherently unholy things. Those people will, at best, end up being forgotten.
They won't be forgotten by God. HE is the most important.

It’s a human failing to be so fond of other humans that they forget God
That is true but a non sequitur.

24 posted on 05/28/2016 7:44:38 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

You ask, why 1500 years. This translates DIRECTLY into the patience of God, which is RENOWNED.


25 posted on 05/28/2016 7:50:58 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

If you really want this to be a retort-fest I could keep on and on and on.

One hurdle to understanding that I see is attempting to evaluate Protestant/evangelical churches as if they were trying to imitate the Roman Catholic community’s idea of itself. Their point is that at their ideal, they try NOT to imitate it.


26 posted on 05/28/2016 7:53:34 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
You ask, why 1500 years. This translates DIRECTLY into the patience of God, which is RENOWNED.

How do YOU know why God did that the way He did? We only know of his relationship with the Jews. How did he treat the other 99% of humanity who didn't believe in ONE God?

I don't assume to know God's reasons for doing things the way He did. I simply accept His plans for all of us and life the best life I can.
I also TRY not to judge others...but sometimes I WONDER at some drivers who seem BENT on killing themselves and me.

27 posted on 05/28/2016 8:03:17 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset
SOCIALISM = Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterized by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production, as well as the political ideologies, theories, and movements that aim at their establishment. [Google]

Baloney: it's government control of every aspect of human existence. Some European countries have "selected socialism," which allows for some freedom to create but taxation is at 75%, at least. Most European countries USED to have the "same-think" of their cultures, so it didn't matter so much.
Letting in immigrants WILL eventually change that. No problem if immigrants are Christian. Otherwise....

Most countries outside of the West have a dictatorship of a relatively FEW stinking rich families who control the money/banks, politics, military and land...just everything.

28 posted on 05/28/2016 8:35:23 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson