If that explanation were true we would be finding the skeletons of pre flood humans that are super old.
That is not the case. Just the opposite is true. Ancient skeletons are almost always fairly young which indicates a short life span.
How do you define, "super old"? What makes you believe skeletons would remain intact? Chances are most of the pre-flood bones are long buried. If found, randomly.
Just the opposite is true. Ancient skeletons are almost always fairly young which indicates a short life span.
Again -- how would it be determined at exactly what age "ancient" bone is?