Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HossB86
did not show up until 200-300 A.D.

And what, precisely, happened in that timeframe? That was during the persecution of the church under the Caesars; Constantine didn't come on the scene until 313.

Basically, your argument is that calling what the Apostles did "Mass" gets in the way of your history, which is -- to be frank -- a made-up convenient fiction to legitimize your own theological position.

You can't point to any substantive difference between what the Apostles did and the Mass, because there isn't any.

43 posted on 07/06/2016 10:08:54 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

To draw your focus to truth, I ask you to answer the following: does the resurrection body Jesus now has IN HEAVEN use blood to maintain the LIFE of His body? ... We are told that the Life of the creature is in the blood. The blood is not the life, the Life is in the blood. That is, on the creature / carnal level.


44 posted on 07/06/2016 10:18:16 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Campion

You asserted, “You can’t point to any substantive difference between what the Apostles did and the Mass, because there isn’t any.” And with that blatant exhibit of Magic Thinking we see how Catholic Tradition was given equal authority with The Bible ... in 1545AD !


45 posted on 07/06/2016 11:13:24 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Campion
The Roman Catholic Church did not exist until 200-300 A.D. Therefore, there was NOTHING done by the Apostles, Disciples, or ANY Christian that was "Catholic" in nature. They worshipped and celebrated The Lord's Supper... There was no "Mass" at all. The only issue with history here is the convoluted misapplication of "tradition" in lieu of truth and trying to call it fact that is done by Catholics and Catholicism.

The substantive difference here is that "Mass" didn't exist then... So, by definition, there is NO similarity -- none. Mass is a man-made hokum that claims to re-sacrifice Christ over and over again while denying his scriptural once and for all sacrifice on the cross.

There is nothing fictional about that. However, if you want to bring up theological fiction, we can do so by simply bringing up CCC 841 as promulgated by Roman Catholicism. The CCC is a teaching document. It teaches, in CCC 841, that Catholics and Muslims worship the same "God."

And as we all know, Chistians and Muslims do NOT worship the same God; Christians worship the One, True, Living God; Muslims worship Satan, The Father of Lies.

So...before Catholics start spouting things about fictions and attempts to legitimize theological fictions, they'd be better served determining if their denomination is teaching them to worship Satan by answering this question: is CCC 841 truth (agreeing with Rome), or is it false (denying Rome and agreeing with God).

Hoss

47 posted on 07/07/2016 2:32:25 PM PDT by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson