Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: tomsbartoo

what note?


64 posted on 04/16/2017 4:12:33 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

The “Note” added by Douay Rheims that I have included at the bottom of the quoted scripture. It says the exact opposite of what you are saying.

The D/R Bible (which is, essentially, the original translation of the Latin, Greek and Arabic texts by St Jerome) was the “Catholic Bible” up until the Second Vatican Council. In the early 1970’s, the Modernist pope (Paul VI) and Modernist bishops abandoned that Bible and adopted the “politically correct” New American Bible.

The original word “fornication” in that specific scripture passage was re-interpreted and re-written as “(unless the marriage is unlawful)” which fit nicely into the Modernist view of so-called “Catholic annulments”. There has been over 50,000 per year since that time.

As noted, the Douay Rheims Bible acknowledges precisely what Jesus actually said––and meant. One may separate from your spouse over fornication, but they may not remarry while their spouse is alive.

Both Bibles are online.


70 posted on 04/16/2017 7:48:50 AM PDT by tomsbartoo (St Pius X watch over us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson