Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Pro-Family Leader Wins Five-Year Battle Against ‘Frivolous’ LGBT Lawsuit
LifeSite News ^ | 6/6/17

Posted on 06/08/2017 6:24:46 AM PDT by marshmallow

June 6, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — A federal district judge yesterday dismissed a leftist lawsuit against Christian pro-family advocate Scott Lively, who was sued for “crimes against humanity” for helping political and faith leaders in Uganda resist the LGBTQ agenda in the east African nation.

Massachusetts District Judge Michael Ponsor, in a ruling laced with harsh pro-homosexual attacks on Lively, nevertheless dismissed the SMUG (Sexual Minorities Uganda) LGBT lawsuit against Lively — five years after it was filed with the help of the far-left Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR).

Ponsor cited a 2013 (unanimous) U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Alien Tort Statute did not apply to international claims as the reason for dismissing the lawsuit.

The Christian-defense legal group assisting Lively, Liberty Counsel, heralded the ruling but chastised Ponsor for failing to dismiss the case earlier and for lacing his decision with extremist, pro-LGBT rhetoric demonizing Lively and distorting his record.

“This is a victory for the Constitution and the rule of law,” said Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel’s founder and chairman, “and all Christians should celebrate the end of a lawsuit intended only to intimidate an innocent pastor into silence.”

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: scottlively

1 posted on 06/08/2017 6:24:46 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

WINNING!


2 posted on 06/08/2017 6:25:48 AM PDT by Guenevere ("I'm no longer a slave to fear, I am a child of God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

THIS IS WHY WE NEED LOSER PAYS

Especially for frivolous suits designed to do nothing but shut down an opponent and cause a chilling effect on everyone else.


3 posted on 06/08/2017 6:34:11 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Some federal judges take a dim view of frivolous lawsuits. I have heard of plaintiffs being jailed for contempt of court and their lawyers being disbarred for bringing such suits into federal court.


4 posted on 06/08/2017 6:39:08 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Homo judge?


5 posted on 06/08/2017 6:39:16 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

There is not a description of Massachusetts District Judge Michael Ponsor that could be considered to be too obscene.


6 posted on 06/08/2017 6:53:37 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Homosexual acts should still be illegal. If they were these perverts wouldn’t be running amuck.


7 posted on 06/08/2017 7:02:01 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

The opinion seems to be only halfway based on the law and half on this judge’s personal and political views. But it’s Massachusetts, so...


8 posted on 06/08/2017 7:39:31 AM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

bump


9 posted on 06/08/2017 7:58:46 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("We will be one people, under one God, saluting one American flag." --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Know Scott from years past in Oregon. He is an absolute trooper for Pro-Family causes and is a hero in my book. Moreover, he is one smart cookie.


10 posted on 06/08/2017 9:02:11 AM PDT by kimoajax (Rack'em & Stack'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Not everyone who wins a lawsuit should have. I agree there needs to be reform but loser pays has the potential to punish and bankrupt innocent parties


11 posted on 06/08/2017 9:23:07 AM PDT by NEPA (Repeal the 17th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NEPA

Innocent parties are usually losing because big guns are against them.

If you know you are in the right- and that the loser will eventually pay, then you can go all out.

I agree that SOMETIMES innocent people can be harmed by the best of intentions- but we would never get anything accomplished if we always wait for perfection.


12 posted on 06/08/2017 9:27:06 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

He should now file suite against SMUG, CCR and the judge.


13 posted on 06/08/2017 9:40:02 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Thank heavens for Liberty Counsel or Lively would have been crushed by legal fees.


14 posted on 06/08/2017 11:08:08 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson