All of which supports intelligent design.
A Lab, a man created environment.
An experiment, an intelligently controlled set of circumstances within that men created environment.
There is NOTHING in creating something in the lab that supports the concept of random occurrences in nature producing the same thing as happened in the controlled environment of a lab.
Unless you are going to try to convince us that what goes on in a laboratory is neither design nor intelligent.
So proving something happens in a lab is not proof that it COULD happen on its own?
The freakin conditions don’t exist naturally on this planet anymore! And since when is making a reproducible experiment in a lab not considered as proof of something.
How about reading the 6th grade version of the scientific method again?