And I presume you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the conditions that scientists create in the lab that they claim represent earth’s early atmosphere, actually existed in reality?
And the assumptions about how the chemicals formed are actually replicating what happened in nature?
Superheavy elements are created in the lab.
Show me where they exist in nature.
We’re never going to know that, it was over 4 billion years ago. All we can do is make an educated guess...even then plants without life aren’t that complicated, the atmo was mostly N, and CO2, with a higher percentage of noble gasses. Those basic amino acids are stable in the lab, they could form in nature except bacteria would break them down.
And like I said in my first post, I could only tell you what’s possible based on the facts. You want the absolute truth on how life started...feel free to hop in your time machine and tell the rest of us. It’s all more reliable then believing in some ancient book of unknown authorship.
[[And I presume you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the conditions that scientists create in the lab that they claim represent earth’s early atmosphere, actually existed in reality?]]
Can’t nature was not capable of separating left hand amino acids from right hand amino acids- the miller experiment had ot ARTIFICIALLY separate the two because the two together destroy one another- the experiment proved that life requires intelligent design AND supernatural intervention in order to happen As well, please note my next post that shows that chemical evolution is not just a little impossible but entirely impossible
sorry forgot htel ink to those calculations i posted- here it is:
http://www.religiouslyincorrect.com/Articles/ChemicalEvolution5.shtml