Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

Okay, I’m done.

Despite repeatedly and unequivocally stating I am NOT here to defend Rome, but rather shine the light on Bible-only duplicity, all of my opponents insist on trying to drag me into defending Rome and/or restating the rationalizations and outright fairytales for their doctrines instead of making credible arguments.

Any problems the Roman Catholic Church may have are utterly irrelevant to the question of “Bible-only” theological legitimacy.


366 posted on 07/05/2017 9:51:36 AM PDT by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

.
I think I agree with you.

What specifically are you talking about?
.


367 posted on 07/05/2017 9:54:41 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger
Despite repeatedly and unequivocally stating I am NOT here to defend Rome, but rather shine the light on Bible-only duplicity, all of my opponents insist on trying to drag me into defending Rome and/or restating the rationalizations and outright fairytales for their doctrines instead of making credible arguments.

Ya had ME fooled!!

393 posted on 07/06/2017 3:58:29 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson