Replies

If you say that Scripture was compiled according to ‘tradition,’ that means that they only put things into it that matched what they had been taught: IE, canon.

And now you’re getting upset at us that we’re using this measure to test Rome’s theology, and Rome’s theology is coming up so painfully short that you have to argue AGAINST the Scripture that YOU claimed that they assembled.

Of all the things I've seen that rile up the Roman Catholics the most is when their false doctrines are compared to Scripture.

The one that really stirs the pot is the Immaculate Conception.

Indeed....Rome's own Catholic Encyclopedia online admits: No direct or categorical and stringent proof of the dogma can be brought forward from Scripture.

Rome claims their doctrines/"traditions" are derived from Scripture....yet this dogma, which RCs have to believe, is admitted not to be found in Scripture.

But Rome cannot back down and admit their error on this. If they did, it would practically destroy the Roman Catholic church as it has invested so heavily in the worship of Mary.

“But Rome cannot back down and admit their error on this. If they did, it would practically destroy the Roman Catholic church as it has invested so heavily in the worship of Mary.”