Apparently you didn't read, or didn't understand, my post. You believe J*sus fulfilled those prophecies because "the new testament" says he did, and you accept, a priori, the NT's claim to be scripture. If you did not already believe in the "new testament" you would not believe J*sus fulfilled those prophecies.
Your argument depends on your conclusion being true. You don't even attempt to prove your conclusion; you simply assume it (a logical fallacy).
Of course I've pointed this out jillions of times and never even gotten a response other than "just wait till you're burning hell!" which also isn't an argument.
[[If you did not already believe in the “new testament” you would not believe J*sus fulfilled those prophecies.]]
Sorry sir- but the statistical probability that Jesus was not the messiah spoken of in new testament is 1 in 10 to the 17’th power- in other words- for one man to fulfill all those prophesies means it absolutely confirms what was prophesied- Look away from the evidence if you wish- but again- don’t expect me to ignore the obvious