[Telepathic Intruder]

I like the poetic feel of the KJV, but the language is outdated, and can lead to misinterpretations. I have a large (some would say display) version given to me by my parents. It’s a New American interpretation, which seems accurate enough, if less poetic.

[Tell It Right]

In my opinion, NIV is a good translation for being easy to read w/o sacrificing on accuracy. However if you've read the Bible a few times and want more than the usual accuracy, then AMP is my favorite. However, there are a few places in the Old Testament where the KJV is more accurate than the AMP.

But this is only for if someone wants to be nit-picky about stuff that doesn't matter much. For instance, I haven't read a version that says Jesus isn't the Son of God or that Jesus died for some other reason besides our salvation. I'm talking about little stuff.

[I got the rope]

I only use the KJV in English and the Reina-Valera Antigua in Spanish.

The KJV is the only Bible that is not confusing. Remember it only takes one generation to make a word archaic. By the way...I believe the KJV is the only english language bible that does not have a copyright.