Posted on 07/17/2021 5:41:30 AM PDT by ebb tide
The publication of this document, although expected, is much more despotic and cruel than anyone could have imagined. Canonists and liturgical experts have already started to offer opinions and their contributions will be welcomed by those who are looking for an intelligent and coherent response.
There is one small phrase in this document that is particularly troubling. In the second paragraph Pope Francis states:
In this way they [John Paul II and Benedict XVI] intended to “facilitate the ecclesial communion of those Catholics who feel attached to some earlier liturgical forms” and not to others [4]. [my emphasis]
The reference [4] is to Pope John Paul II, Apostolic letter given Motu proprio “Ecclesia Dei” 2 July 1988. On even a cursory examination it is clear that this is not a direct and complete quote from Ecclesia Dei although it is presented as though it is – there is no ellipsis, for example. But it was the phrase ‘and not to others’ which is pertinent and shocking. Perhaps it is a clumsy use of words but it creates a deliberate segregation among the faithful and is surely unique in any document emanating from Rome.
The relevant text of Ecclesia Dei states:
To all those Catholic faithful who feel attached to some previous liturgical and disciplinary forms of the Latin tradition I wish to manifest my will to facilitate their ecclesial communion by means of the necessary measures to guarantee respect for their rightful aspirations.
There is no mention, either in Ecclesia Dei or in Summorum Pontificum of “and not to others”. This is clearly a tactic by Francis to isolate those who feel attachment to certain liturgical forms and is unworthy, to say the least, of any document being issued by the Supreme Pontiff.
Pope Saint John Paul II wished to “facilitate their ecclesial communion” and to “guarantee respect for their rightful aspirations” [my emphasis]. This is the mark of a true shepherd having love and care for ALL his flock. He put his arms around everyone; he did not separate anyone and banish some to the margins as this document Traditionis Custodes does.
And what is also shocking is the fact that Francis is ordering his bishops to do his bidding in implementing this spiritual apartheid; introducing conflict where there is harmony. No Catholic should be comfortable in publicly criticising a document issued motu proprio by a Pope but there are many in the clergy of all ranks who might concur that this is a step too far.
Ping
Whiskey Tango Francis
Do they think that no one will read these documents?
That this is a motu proprio makes loads of difference—a motu proprio is not primarily a teaching document, but a legal document meant to promote law. Giving an explanation that is solid re-enforces the law and ties it in with previous law and previous teaching. Giving an explanation that is, shall we say, less than solid, may not do this so well, and if done badly enough may have a contrary effect with regards to the reception of the law.
It only takes a couple of people who know things to read such a document and sound the alarm and if the situation is right this will make the reception and effective promulgation of the law be, shall we say, less than smooth.
What about the Ambrosian Rite? It is also an “earlier liturgical form.”
I was wondering about that too. I’ve been to a few traditional Dominican rite Latin masses. Bergoglio apparently forgot to put the hammer down on that too.
Will these same bishops be the ones who enforce Beroglio's Traditionis Custodes like dictators?
The bishop of Little Rock, Ark, which covers the entire state has already shut-down the three indult Masses in the state, leaving only two FSSP chapels in the state, which are 200 miles apart, that will be allowed to continue celebrating the TLM.
Wow. The authoritarianism of the bishops is stronger than the pleas of the traditional laity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.