try reading without the log
And, if Mom has apologized and I have apologized on behalf of Calvinist, then please tell me why you have refused to apolozied for:
saying Calvinist are "humped up on your leg like a frothing dog"
again, not an accurate quote - look youve misquoted it, twisted it and changed it to suit your needs for the last time - what I actually said was Hey - he knows where Im coming from - Free Grace baby - Wesley made it quite clear - why I need to rehash it with a hammer wielding "christian" eludes me - but if you want to go there - we CAN play that pissing game all day if you want... in the end solving NOTHING - as he - (and apparently you) have no desire to discourse calmly and in a demeanor befitting the subject matter. As for misrepresenting thier comments - Its plainly apparent to all (with open minds) exactly what is happening here. - I came into that topic with an open mind, got dusted up a bit and ended by offering prayer - just as I did throughout the discourse.
Ive yet to see any real Christ like attitudes in trying to sway me as a "lost" brother - Instead the leg of Calvinism is humped like a frothing pinscher. C'mon - sway me with brotherly love - point being you can't - and for that I'll pray.
- youve frothed, youve bitten, you plainly have difficulty reading the difference between "denom" and "demon" - therefore you run with the pack and have shared the same fleas - I find it amusing you get pious a month later and only when brother doc takes a lashing for spewage to DBK. No, that one stands on its own legs as it is my own opinion to which I am completely entitled. If you recall, you stated I am mentally unbalanced or unstable, which (while possibly accurate given the thorazine treatments), is entirely your opinion-
God allows me to hate evil - what you people practice in the name of Christianity is evil. Hence, I hate the construct as you hate "satanic" arminianism
What I have done, is precisely the same doc has done repeatedly by calling arminianism "satanic". He spoke to the group, as do I - there is no individual personal attack in those comments.
regarding your other complaint.
and Calvinists are "animals"
What kind of person drags an innocent person (someones wife) into a fracas? surely not a rational one, or one that purports to debate on the "playing field of truth". OP got suspended twice, doc is close, youve had posts pulled, as has Ma, I proved Jean was lying about the dog quote, yet I have to apologize? - the rationale escapes me. I will however rephrase it. HYPER Calvinists are animals, (my apologies to rational Calvinists, rhesus monkeys, small crawly things and Lorraine B.) I assume you are a "regular" calvinist. Now again, note the construct of the comment. Just as OP calls my faith "spiritual crack cocaine" in a non specific manner, my animal comment was put forth in the same manner.
Rather we need to look at how calvinists degenerate into personal attacks regarding mental accuity and attacks upon others spouses, with whom they hold a doctrinal beef.
I ping the admin moderator, so that he or she can assess my comments and address them as seen fit.
Amen
Through thy precepts I get understanding, therefore I hate every false way (Ps.119:104)
I am a grown up and I hate censorship..no way I would seek advance approval..
BTW, I thought this was a particularly good part of your continued theme of personal attack with that "dog" theme that you have been calling me.
And I like part where you called me the hypocrite with the "log" comment as a direct response to my apology. Oh, well, your spirit doesn't disappoint.