Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bishops betraying the Catholic Church
WorldNetDaily ^ | June 14, 2002 | Mary Jo Anderson

Posted on 06/14/2002 11:03:34 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Bishops betraying the Catholic Church

By Mary Jo Anderson

Let me tell you a story. It is a story of wickedness and betrayal. It is a demonic plan I have witnessed personally. It is a story you won't hear from the 700 media personnel who have converged on Dallas for the National Conference of Catholic Bishops' June 13-15 meeting. Their task is to report on how the bishops of the United States address the clerical sex-abuse scandals. Not one in a hundred, however, will report what is really happening in Dallas because they simply don't know which dots to connect. When the set of concealed dots is connected, the picture within the picture is harrowing.

An invisible war is being fought for the life of the Catholic Church in the United States – and it is a fight to the death. The war is more than a century old now, and this is a key engagement. The war is not about pedophilia or homosexuality, as repugnant as those two symptoms are. It is about an attempted coup d'état within the Catholic Church – one of only two global institutions on this planet. Whoever gets the Keys of St. Peter walks off with the power to change the world – or so the betrayers think. I'll tell you why.

At the turn of the 20th century the popes had spoken out forcefully against socialism and communism. Pope Leo XIII issued Rerum novarum (1891) that acknowledged workers' rights but upheld the right to private property, a foundation of freedom.

The Christian worldview was under attack. A new worldview, Rationalism, was menacing all of Western Civilization. Rationalism had cut deep gorges in Christendom. Many no longer believed in Christian Revelation, that is, the scripture. If man could not prove a premise, man need not be bound by any given premise. The created order as given in the Bible could be re-ordered according to man's design; communism, utopia – fill in the blank. With the aid of science and technology, man did not need God or His musty old laws. A new order was coming of age.

In 1899, the pope also sent a weighty letter to the bishops of the United States, Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae, that warned against the dangers of "Americanism." Essentially, he warned the U.S. bishops that their primary identification had to be as Catholic shepherds. He cautioned against "new opinions" that some American bishops held that believed the gospel and doctrine should be accommodated to American culture: The Church must not "shape her teachings more in accord with the spirit of the age and relax some of her ancient severity and make some concessions …" or "to tone down the meaning. …"

Yet for a hundred years, many American bishops and theologians have believed that the American culture, dominant in the world, has something to teach the Church. They subordinated the command to evangelize the culture to their vision of an Americanized Catholic Church. For the first 50 years, these men were a small underground cadre of dissidents. By the close of the Second Vatican Council, the second generation of "modernists" had spread their Americanized vision of church in seminaries and universities.

Meanwhile, the American culture was growing ever more secular, and the sexual revolution, feminism and liberalism had a death grip on the foundational principles of the Christian worldview. Campus radicals and professors rebelled against authority – not parental or school authority, but the very idea of any authority with moral absolutes.

Catholic dissidents were swept up into the rebellion. They confidently talk of "structural change," meaning to shove over the Catholic Church and build a "democratic" church where "power is shared" and doctrine is determined by "consensus" rather than by scripture and Jesus' teachings.

These misguided "experts" would have us believe that if only the Church had been controlled by liberals, women priests and laity, this crisis would not have happened. Rubbish – they created the problem in the first place in an attempt to force changes in Church doctrine and discipline. If the U.S. bishops and theologians had been faithful to the teachings of the Church and their own vows, this crisis would be a footnote rather than a chapter in Church history.

It became fashionable for some American prelates to flaunt one's independence from the Church – to prove that they were not stodgy old time Catholics, but the sophisticated "American Catholics." Many of the bishops in Dallas today came of age in the '60s era of rebellion. They resent, as free Americans, being told what to do by the Vatican. As early as 1961, the Vatican issued an instruction, The Careful Selection And Training of Candidates For The States Of Perfection And Sacred Orders, prohibiting the admission of homosexuals to the seminaries. It was simply ignored by those bent on "changing the structure" of the Church to conform to the liberal American culture.

Others were weak and allowed the National Conference of Catholic Bishops to push them into acquiescence. Soon, the internal committees of the NCCB were composed of homosexuals and modernists, feminists and even New Age devotees. They have a death grip on the levers of power within the Conference. An example is the pastoral letter from the U.S. bishops on homosexuality, Always Our Children. This flawed "gay positive" document was drafted by a committee – not by the bishops – and issued before the majority of U.S. bishops had even read the document. They did not vote on its contents (so much for "consensus"). The Vatican finally forced a revision of this squishy "pastoral" instruction. Even now, in Dallas, a similar committee set the agenda for the deliberations.

By the mid 1960s, the Rockefeller family had formed an alliance with Fr. Theodore Hesburgh of Notre Dame University and sought an audience with Pope Paul VI in order to "advise" the pope to permit birth control. The Rockefeller interests were promoting population control. Hesburgh and others at Notre Dame, including Fr. Richard McBrien seen on "The O'Reilly Factor," worked feverishly to change the Church's teaching – if not in doctrine, at least in the practices adopted in millions of Catholic bedrooms. McBrien's book, "Catholicism" was so flawed it was – finally – censored by the U.S. bishops. But it is still on the shelf at Notre Dame University, infecting a new generation of graduates.

The modernists were in lock step with American culture. Worse, they adopted Marxist strategies to achieve their goals. Msgr. Jack Egan, Chicago icon of liberalism in the '60s and '70s, befriended Marxist Saul Alinsky, author of "Rules for Radicals," a manifesto for tearing down a community or institution and rebuilding it in the communist image. The Marxist vision of androgynous masses, where the State is Father and families are those who share a domicile portioned out by the State-Father, appealed to those who cry for "justice." This "justice" is enforced by an all-powerful state that would erase any distinction between groups of people; they call it "power-sharing." These rules were promoted as "liberation" and applied to major issues in the Church, such as "liberating" women from "patriarchy" or "liberating" homosexuality from homophobic old men in the Vatican.

They no longer believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church, but like communist moles, they burrow in to make changes from within. They are instructed to "defect in place" as feminist nun Miriam Therese Winter advises. Prominent theologians have taught that those who control religion control the culture. Defrocked theologian Hans Kung promotes a "Global Ethic" (not the gospel) that mirrors the agenda of world ideologues. He and American Catholic dissident organizations want a "Vatican III" where new structures will include a constitution for the Church and a lay co-pope. Those who have grand visions for a re-ordered world based on Rationalism rather than Revelation seek a means of global governance to enforce their vision of "peace and justice."

These and others, pernicious men and women, promote abortion as a "choice" and applaud population control as a religious duty that preserves the environment (they love the Earth Charter). They accept euthanasia as "merciful" and do not object that nations like Sweden have moved to make it a crime to preach or teach against homosexuality.

The liberal media in the U.S. understand this point. They also defend homosexuality in the culture. They do not want to use this crisis in the Church to advocate against homosexual activity but to promote changes in the Catholic Church: married priests, women priests and acceptance of homosexuals.

That's why CNN trots out folks like Anthony Padavano to advocate for married priests. But Padavano is also keynote speaker for the dissident organization Call to Action that promotes homosexuality in the Church. Or CNN's guest "expert," Sr. Bridget Mary Meehan, who calls for "structural changes" that allow laity greater say. Meehan and others of her ilk expect that once the laity is given control of the Church, it will relax sexual morality and resemble the Democratic Party, that is, liberal American culture. Because the American bishops have worried more about their independence from Rome than allegiance to the gospel, they have become more easily controlled by the liberal agenda – often without realizing it. The media has hushed up past foibles, but the price now is high – a lesson learned too late. The American bishops are a means to an end: The titanic battle is for the Keys of St. Peter – to control the structure and doctrine of the Church. The issue isn't homosexuality, it is to empty the Church from within of the truth of Revelation. But why?

To silence the lone international voice for morality, that's why. Hate the Catholic Church or love it, it must be admitted that it publicly teaches and preaches against the totalitarian, utilitarian worldview. The Catholic Church insists on the dignity and value of every person, born and unborn. The world ideologues howl when the Church stands up for life as sacrosanct. At Cairo, at Beijing, at the World Summit for Children and behind the scenes in nation after nation, the Church parries those who would impose a utilitarian global vision on us all.

The moral voice of the Catholic Church stands between modernists and their New World Order vision that is opposed to the old order of Revelation. What the ideologues need is to put a cork in the mouth of the Church and control the Keys of St. Peter in the near future. To use the Church and her universities and schools and hospitals the world over – to use them for their diabolical agenda.

Notice the timing of the Boston Globe's "breaking" story. The Globe and others have known for over a decade about the growing gay sub-culture in the Church, but the Globe and others simply winked – they are no less guilty of a cover up than Cardinal Law. It did not seem worthy of print. Until, that is, Pope John Paul II, the disliked "reactionary" pope faltered during Christmas masses and seemed so frail that new teams of correspondents were dispatched to Rome in anticipation of a papal conclave.

The goal among modernists, clerical and secular, is to use this crisis to create chaos so large that a new pope will have to deal with the crisis as his first order of business. If a momentum is built that insists that the old order is the problem, perhaps the cardinals can be stampeded into electing an unusual pope: a candidate approved by the New York Times and the United Nations.

There is more to this story, but I think the picture is clear enough.

Mary Jo Anderson is a contributing reporter to WorldNetDaily and a contributing editor to many Catholic publications, including Crisis magazine.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2002 11:03:34 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Siobhan; Goldenstategirl; Maryz; Americancolleen; Salvation; ninenot; sockmonkey; Polycarp
ping
2 posted on 06/14/2002 11:08:53 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Antoninus; sandyeggo; frogandtoad; saradippity; maryz; Jeff Chandler; ken5050...
This is an article I will e-mail to my address book.

ping

3 posted on 06/14/2002 11:57:41 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It did not seem worthy of print. Until, that is, Pope John Paul II, the disliked "reactionary" pope faltered during Christmas masses and seemed so frail that new teams of correspondents were dispatched to Rome in anticipation of a papal conclave.

And the Geoghan scandal broke, I think, in January. I wonder, though, if indeed "[i]t did not seem worthy of print." Maybe the Globe was saving it up deliberately for a time auspicious to its purposes.

This article is invaluable.

4 posted on 06/14/2002 12:19:23 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Whoa! I'm bookmarking this one.
5 posted on 06/14/2002 12:24:46 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
bump for later.
6 posted on 06/14/2002 12:43:21 PM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan ; maryz ; american colleen ; nickcarraway
"The Homosexual Captivity of the Church"

Who benefits?

7 posted on 06/14/2002 12:56:36 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
I see the excellencys and eminences just voted down Bishop Bruskewitz's ammendment to study the problems of homosexuality, and dissent to see if they have contributed to this problem...

Damn, they don't want the REAL problems that created this out of the box, do they?

8 posted on 06/14/2002 1:11:08 PM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
I almost cried. Was there one voice for the amendment? My heart is heavy.
9 posted on 06/14/2002 1:14:10 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is an incredible article. Thanks for the post.

It is an eye-opener. I never realized exactly what is at stake ... but the Keys of St. Peter. Wow.

We need to pray and be diligent.

10 posted on 06/14/2002 1:14:17 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
Bookmark Bump!
11 posted on 06/14/2002 1:19:03 PM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: american colleen;sockmonkey
I wasn't watching, but that is very disappointing that they won't even study it. Of course, I didn't even think the suggestion would be made in public.
12 posted on 06/14/2002 1:19:35 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The modernists were in lock step with American culture. Worse, they adopted Marxist strategies to achieve their goals. Msgr. Jack Egan, Chicago icon of liberalism in the '60s and '70s, befriended Marxist Saul Alinsky, author of "Rules for Radicals," a manifesto for tearing down a community or institution and rebuilding it in the communist image.

I knew the modernists have been trying to destroy the Church from within, but I didn't know one of the flakes actually sought out Alinsky. Great find, thanks!

13 posted on 06/14/2002 1:33:41 PM PDT by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Great offering and very frightening, nick!

Time to engage the heavy hitters of intercession ... among them the Archangels and Our Blessed Mother in a big way.

Rosaries for priests who are not entrapped or entrenched and prayers for a laity that does not abandon the true Church!
14 posted on 06/14/2002 1:40:16 PM PDT by AKA Elena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
In Texas, we would say the Bishops have no huevos..also, I might add I wonder if some of them even have souls.
15 posted on 06/14/2002 1:42:24 PM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ELS
"I knew the modernists have been trying to destroy the Church from within, but I didn't know one of the flakes actually sought out Alinsky. Great find, thanks!"

Alinsky befriended Egan!?! Oy vey. I have to ask...is this Mgsr. Jack Egan the Present NY Cardinal?(Just waiting for the other Gramsci shoe to drop.)

So as we scroll forward to the future...in what decade will they start to dump the Sacraments?
16 posted on 06/14/2002 1:55:43 PM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
Fr Gould on EWTN said yesterday that they "are afraid" with regard to speaking out against homosexuality. Makes you wonder whether they have been receiving death threats or fear these "act up" descecrations the homos and lesbians stage occasionally.
17 posted on 06/14/2002 1:57:33 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; saradippity
Others were weak and allowed the National Conference of Catholic Bishops to push them into acquiescence. Soon, the internal committees of the NCCB were composed of homosexuals and modernists, feminists and even New Age devotees. They have a death grip on the levers of power within the Conference. An example is the pastoral letter from the U.S. bishops on homosexuality, Always Our Children. This flawed "gay positive" document was drafted by a committee – not by the bishops – and issued before the majority of U.S. bishops had even read the document. They did not vote on its contents (so much for "consensus"). The Vatican finally forced a revision of this squishy "pastoral" instruction. Even now, in Dallas, a similar committee set the agenda for the deliberations.
An important point. Always Our Children is a seminal document that is cited time and again by "gay friendly" Catholics in support of "tolerance" towards practicing homosexuals and acceptance of "gay ministries" that minister to them. Examples include:

1. Dignity:

Robert Mialovich, then President of Dignity/USA stated:
Our hope is that all bishops, pastors and parents will take it to heart and that we will see improved ministry to our community. Since its founding in 1969, Dignity/USA has been working for improved pastoral attention to the real lives of gay men and women. The bishops' letter recognizes some of these needs and our task will be to hold them to their words.
2. National Association of Catholic Diocesan Lesbian and Gay Ministries
Using Always Our Children

Rev. Raymond C. Kellerman, a priest of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, will explore this pastoral letter, offering information about church documents and how they come to be written, and provide a study/discussion guide. In addition to his work with gay and lesbian people, Fr. Kellerman is a pastor, is involved with outreach to the Hispanic Community, and is a member of Isaiah Ministries, a team of preachers.

3. New Ways Ministries:
Writings

National Conference of Catholic Bishops October, 1997, statement on gays and lesbians entitled "Always Our Children: A Pastoral Message to Parents of Homosexual Children and Suggestions for Pastoral Ministers."

4. Gay and Lesbian Family Ministry (Cleveland):
The U.S. Catholic Bishops have outstretched a hand of support to parents of gay and lesbian persons through their pastoral message of "Always Our Children". The diocese has responded to this message by providing a number of parent support groups with the help of several parish communities in the diocese. If you are a parent, sibling or friend of a gay or lesbian person struggling to understand, accept and learn more about the reality of your family member one of the support groups listed below will be helpful.
I have written to Mary Jo Anderson to get further details about the changes made as per the Vatican's instructions, and will post them if I receive an answer.
18 posted on 06/14/2002 2:01:02 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
..they "are afraid" with regard to speaking out against homosexuality...

I figured that they are afraid because some of these homos have the goods on them, and have threatened to out them.

I just discovered for any TEXAS Catholics out there, that TXCN has been covering the conference live, too. Wish I'd known that earlier.

19 posted on 06/14/2002 2:02:18 PM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Great. Please update us.
20 posted on 06/14/2002 2:14:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson