Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: saradippity
Your post is of the "mistakes were made" variety. Cardinal Law did not follow bad advice. He knew what he was doing. He had plenty of evidence his coverups were harming kids. He had twenty years to figure out that when he transferred a pedophile it was guaranteed that children would be abused, even raped. He even praised Shanley in a letter so he could pawn him off one more time to an unsuspecting diocese. Yet he had absolute proof--a thousand page dossier on the man--that this priest had raped a six year old and had abused hudreds of other kids, that he was an active supporter of NAMBLA. And Law had around 82 such priests that he protected for over twenty years. I'm still trying to figure out what it takes for a cardinal to have his resignation accepted by Rome after such a display of absolute unmitigated corruption. Apparently the destruction of thousands of kids' souls is not enough to get anybody fired. Certainly not for you. You're still making phony excuses for the Cardinal.
47 posted on 10/14/2002 1:51:20 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: ultima ratio
Do you live in a diocese where the bishop was recommended by Jean Jadot?That would have been between 1972 and 1980.If you do could you find out the motto he chose when he was enthroned,or whatever it's called.Thanks.
50 posted on 10/14/2002 2:02:13 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: ultima ratio
Nice post. The truth really hurts the child molester supporters, which they richly deserve.
62 posted on 10/14/2002 4:47:23 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson