Replies

Actually, I had considered that. I still fail to see how this proves that foreknowledge is causative in and of itself. Does God's foreknowledge cause events to be?

No, God's creative Election of Divine Action, amongst different Foreknown Potentialities of Divine Action, causes Events to be.

You would agree that, prior to Creation, God foreknows all the differing potentialities of Divine Action available to the Power of His Omnipotence, and all the differing logically-dependent, subsequent, and contingent Events encompassed in each (including the differing Choices which Men will make in logically-dependent response to differing Elections of Divine Action), wouldn't you?

Therefore, since the different outcomes foreknown by this antecedent Prescience (God's pre-creative Foreknowledge of all Creative potentialities) include different choices of men made in logically-dependent response to different elections of Divine action (see #5), we must correctly state that the Election of God pre-determines what the Decisions of Man SHALL BE.

If so, then how can God's foreknowledge include possibilities as well as actualities?

Of course God's foreknowledge includes Possibilities. Read your Bible.

Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for IF the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.

Prior to Creation, God foreknows all the differing potentialities of Divine Action available to the Power of His Omnipotence, and all the differing logically-dependent, subsequent, and contingent Events encompassed in each.

Since the different outcomes foreknown by this antecedent Prescience (God's pre-creative Foreknowledge of all Creative potentialities) include different choices of men made in logically-dependent response to different elections of Divine action (see #5), we must correctly state that the Election of God pre-determines what the Decisions of Man SHALL BE.

It can't, because if foreknowledge=causation, then if God foreknows multiple reactions, they are all actual realities, and not potential realities, yet we all know of only one actual reality.

No, you have it wrong.

Here, think of it this way:

1.) God's Pre-Creative Foreknowledge = God's knowledge of all possible Potentialities of Divine Action (including the differing choices which created Men will choose in logically-dependent response to differing Divine Elections).
2.) God's Election = God decides which Foreknown Potentiality (i.e., to NOT perform the salvific Miracles in Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom) He ordains to create, thereby predestining the foreknown Result of that foreknown Potentiality (that these cities will NOT Repent).
3.) God's post-Creative Prescience = Having Elected to grant Actuality (that is, to Create) a specific Potentiality (i.e., to NOT perform Miracles), God foreknows the Non-Repentance of Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom as a Foreknown Actuality (i.e., a Certainty).

By this consideration, we see that the Non-Repentance of the Men of Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom become Actualities in the Divine Mind only as a result of God's precedent Elections -- at least two precedent Elections in particular:

1.) To Create these Men in the first place (for prior to God's Election to actually create them, the existence and/or non-existence of the Men themselves were both only Conditional Potentialities in the Mind of God -- their reality itself being Conditionally logically-dependent upon God's election whether or not to create them), and...
2.) To NOT perform the salvific Miracles therein (for prior to God's Election to NOT perform the salvific Miracles therein, the repentance and/or non-repentance of the Men of Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom were only Conditional Potentialities in the Mind of God -- their repentance or non-repentance being Conditionally logically-dependent upon God's election whether or not to perform the salvific Miracles therein).

Think it through, Gram. It's not really that difficult.

No, God's creative Election of Divine Action, amongst different Foreknown Potentialities of Divine Action, causes Events to be.

In a sense, yes. It doesn't necessitate the event though, and you will note that the subject of these two chapters from Elements of Divinity has been free agency contrasted with necessity.

You would agree that, prior to Creation, God foreknows all the differing potentialities of Divine Action available to the Power of His Omnipotence, and all the differing logically-dependent, subsequent, and contingent Events encompassed in each (including the differing Choices which Men will make in logically-dependent response to differing Elections of Divine Action), wouldn't you?

What exactly do you mean by 'logically-dependent'?

Therefore, since the different outcomes foreknown by this antecedent Prescience (God's pre-creative Foreknowledge of all Creative potentialities) include different choices of men made in logically-dependent response to different elections of Divine action (see #5), we must correctly state that the Election of God pre-determines what the Decisions of Man SHALL BE.

Of course God's foreknowledge includes Possibilities. Read your Bible.

You missed my point. If God's foreknowledge equals pre-ordination/predestination, then each of God's foreknown possibilities is really an actuality, which means that there are multiple actualities, despite the fact that we are aware of only one reality--not to mention that we would "statistically" find that several of these multiple actualities contradicted. (I.E., God foreknows the potentiality that Mary will marry Joseph; God also foreknows the 'potentiality' that Mary will die before meeting Joseph. Because God's foreknowledge preordains what is, and God foreknows that both are potentialities, then both are realities. Mary marries Joseph, and Mary dies before meeting Joseph.)

Prior to Creation, God foreknows all the differing potentialities of Divine Action available to the Power of His Omnipotence, and all the differing logically-dependent, subsequent, and contingent Events encompassed in each.

Well, at least we agree that the events are contingent. Of course, if they are contingent, then they are not necessary; and if they are not necessary, then man is a free moral agent, which seems to be (if I remember correctly--it's been so long since we were on the actual subject and not a tangent ;P) what this and the other recent thread that I started were about.

Since the different outcomes foreknown by this antecedent Prescience (God's pre-creative Foreknowledge of all Creative potentialities) include different choices of men made in logically-dependent response to different elections of Divine action (see #5), we must correctly state that the Election of God pre-determines what the Decisions of Man SHALL BE.

Sure. However, God's prescience and omnipotent action do not necessitate these events (you've already admitted that they are contingent and not necessary), which leaves it with man's free agency as to the reactions man makes to God's actions.

Here, think of it this way: 1.) God's Pre-Creative Foreknowledge = God's knowledge of all possible Potentialities of Divine Action (including the differing choices which created Men will choose in logically-dependent response to differing Divine Elections).

Okay.

2.) God's Election = God decides which Foreknown Potentiality (i.e., to NOT perform the salvific Miracles in Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom) He ordains to create, thereby predestining the foreknown Result of that foreknown Potentiality (that these cities will NOT Repent).

In a sense, you could say that. At the same time, God's choice to "create" an actuality from a potentiality is not the necessitating cause of man's actions. Man may still freely choose to do opposite of what God foresees as reality based upon His actions; he won't, however, because he freely chooses to do what God foresaw him doing in the event that God would choose to 'create' an event. (Wow, that sounds convoluted. Nonetheless, the brief of it is that man's moral free agency is still intact. Fine, God chose to do something; however, he did not 'efficiently cause' man to act as the man did in response to God's action. Man chose freely, and despite the fact that God foresaw man choosing as he did, man still had the liberty to choose otherwise as he did. God foresaw, but did not effectively cause, man's choice.)

Since the different outcomes foreknown by this antecedent Prescience (God's pre-creative Foreknowledge of all Creative potentialities) include different choices of men made in logically-dependent response to different elections of Divine action (see #5), we must correctly state that the Election of God pre-determines what the Decisions of Man SHALL BE.

I'll concede that. Even so, God's choices do not effectively cause man's responses in such a way as to make man not a free moral agent.