Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Starwind
Peter is warning believers about false teachers (chapter 2) and false teaching regarding Christ's return (chapter 3). The discussion is about unsaved people but it is directed to believers giving them perspective and comfort.

If the delay is so more people might "choose God" and the number of the elect is not fixed, why should He ever return? Furthermore in the Arminian view, His will is certainly less powerful than the will of people who say either 'yes' or 'no' from an unfettered will. Yet the point of 2 Peter 3 is that God is indeed in control and not biting His fingernails waiting for man to act.

7 posted on 11/29/2002 6:55:14 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: drstevej
If the delay is so more people might "choose God" and the number of the elect is not fixed, why should He ever return? Furthermore in the Arminian view, His will is certainly less powerful than the will of people who say either 'yes' or 'no' from an unfettered will. Yet the point of 2 Peter 3 is that God is indeed in control and not biting His fingernails waiting for man to act.

I had always thought that God wasn't delaying for us to get our act together, but that He does have a 'fixed' number of total souls in His mind throughout all of His creation, and the 'delay' is actually His plan to give every soul it's incarnated 'turn at bat' so to speak, afterwhich he will return. He does know each of us from before the foundations of the world, and he knows the end from the beginning.

God's soverignty over man's free will is not in question. Just like a parent who has sovereignty over their children and a plan for their children, the parent still encourages their children to exercise and mature their free will, and intervenes only when the parent thinks best (for reasons a child will never fathom and unaware of the myriad ways until they mature).

The argument I thought you'd offer (which I think is stronger though still unsatisfying) is that 2 Pet3:9a alludes to God being patient toward 'us' [the brethren, the object of his epistle] and thus 2 Pet 3:9b further refers to 'any of us' and 'all of us'.

But I think there is a better reconciliation of God's sovereignty in election/reprobation and His designing 'free will' into His creation, without us having to insert words into His scripture (any of His scripture)....but I don't yet know what it is.

8 posted on 11/29/2002 7:26:53 PM PST by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson